Oh, I just realized I had not changed the links, only the
examples. They are all fixed now.
--
Jason Dusek
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
Yes, it is fixed (the link is to the history).
--
Jason Dusek
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
| Cc: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: baffling manual sections
|
| 2009/05/20 Simon Peyton-Jones :
| > | I'm a little puzzled by these seeming duplicate pages in the
| > | manual:
| > |
| > |
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/current/docs/users_guide/type-extensions.h
2009/05/20 Simon Peyton-Jones :
> | I'm a little puzzled by these seeming duplicate pages in the
> | manual:
> |
> |
> http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/current/docs/users_guide/type-extensions.html
> |
> |
> http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/current/docs/users_guide/data-type-extensions.html
>
>
| I'm a little puzzled by these seeming duplicate pages in the
| manual:
|
|
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/current/docs/users_guide/type-extensions.html
|
| http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/current/docs/users_guide/data-type-
| extensions.html
The former is garbage. It's part of an *
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Denis Bueno wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 16:07, Jason Dusek wrote:
>> The former page also has a curious discussion of standalone
>> deriving with a `for` keyword:
>>
>>
>> http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/current/docs/users_guide/type-extensions.html#sta
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 16:07, Jason Dusek wrote:
> The former page also has a curious discussion of standalone
> deriving with a `for` keyword:
>
>
> http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/current/docs/users_guide/type-extensions.html#stand-alone-deriving
Without this extension, adding an Eq impl
