group keyword with TransformListComp
|
| Hi,
|
| The question of syntax is always something that provokes intense
| discussion. My interest (and concern) with the choice of syntax in
| this case is three-fold:
|
| 1) I want HLint to turn on as many Haskell extensions as possible when
| parsing, wit
Hi,
The question of syntax is always something that provokes intense
discussion. My interest (and concern) with the choice of syntax in
this case is three-fold:
1) I want HLint to turn on as many Haskell extensions as possible when
parsing, with the trade off that they don't break a massive numbe
Hi,
I agree this is annoying. It was hard to find syntax which was both
meaningful and currently unused, so we settled on this instead. As
Simon says, suggestions are welcome!
Note that group *should* be parsed as a special id, so you can still
import D.L qualified and then use dot notation to ac
I don't mind what keyword (or indeed syntax) we use! Better alternatives
welcome.
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: glasgow-haskell-users-boun...@haskell.org [mailto:glasgow-haskell-users-
| boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Neil Mitchell
| Sent: 21 June 2009 19:15
| To: glasgow-haskel
Don't use TransformListComp ??
-- Don
ndmitchell:
> Hi,
>
> The TransformListComp extension makes group a keyword. Unfortunately
> group is a useful function, and is even in Data.List. Thus,
> Data.List.group and TransformListComp are incompatible. This seems a
> very painful concession to give
