And to make many, many peoples life easier the binaries could have
been included in ghc 6.10.2 (but I know there are some philosophical
reasons against it).
-- Lennart
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Don Stewart wrote:
> daniel.is.fischer:
>> Am Sonntag 05 April 2009 10:24:25 schrieb Ashley Ya
daniel.is.fischer:
> Am Sonntag 05 April 2009 10:24:25 schrieb Ashley Yakeley:
> > Duncan Coutts wrote:
> > > In the mean time you can just:
> > >
> > > $ cabal install time
> >
> > Where do I get the "cabal" command? I'm installing GHC on a new machine
> > and I was hoping it would be included. I
Am Sonntag 05 April 2009 10:24:25 schrieb Ashley Yakeley:
> Duncan Coutts wrote:
> > In the mean time you can just:
> >
> > $ cabal install time
>
> Where do I get the "cabal" command? I'm installing GHC on a new machine
> and I was hoping it would be included. I can't obtain it via "cabal
> instal
Duncan Coutts wrote:
In the mean time you can just:
$ cabal install time
Where do I get the "cabal" command? I'm installing GHC on a new machine
and I was hoping it would be included. I can't obtain it via "cabal
install cabal-install" because I don't have the cabal command and I
don't kno
On Thu, 02 Apr 2009 10:42:50 +0100, Duncan Coutts
wrote:
>On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 13:47 +0900, Benjamin L.Russell wrote:
>> On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 18:48:13 -0700, Lyle Kopnicky
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Great! But what happened to the time package? It was in 6.10.1. Has it been
>> >intentionally excluded from
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 13:47 +0900, Benjamin L.Russell wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 18:48:13 -0700, Lyle Kopnicky
> wrote:
>
> >Great! But what happened to the time package? It was in 6.10.1. Has it been
> >intentionally excluded from 6.10.2?
Yes, the maintainer of the time package asked for it to
