On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Simon Peyton-Jones
wrote:
> Yes I did. That too was an oversight. Thanks for pointing both out.
Ok thanks (I asked just to make sure I don't have to create a ticket.)
Bas
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-
Yes I did. That too was an oversight. Thanks for pointing both out.
S
| -Original Message-
| From: Bas van Dijk [mailto:v.dijk@gmail.com]
| Sent: 07 January 2010 08:44
| To: Simon Peyton-Jones
| Cc: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
| Subject: Re: Associativity of ViewPatterns
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Simon Peyton-Jones
wrote:
> Good point. I'll fix that, in HEAD at least.
Thanks,
BTW did you fix the infix instance headers problem in HEAD I
previously mailed about?
regards,
Bas
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Good point. I'll fix that, in HEAD at least.
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: glasgow-haskell-users-boun...@haskell.org [mailto:glasgow-haskell-users-
| boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Bas van Dijk
| Sent: 06 January 2010 12:44
| To: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
| Subject: Associ
