On Sat, 6 Sep 2003, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
> simonmar:
> > > I was a bit too soon reporting the sparc-sun-solaris2, two
> > > attempts have died with stg_ap_v_ret. Same result sparc-*-openbsd.
>
Also with mips-sgi-irix65 . An attempt died with stg_ap_v_ret .
I'm trying to follow Ian's ste
simonmar:
> > I was a bit too soon reporting the sparc-sun-solaris2, two
> > attempts have died with stg_ap_v_ret. Same result sparc-*-openbsd.
> > Is there an endianess thing here? What is the endianess of the
> > amd64 and the powerpc? Are than any tricks I can try?
>
> Hmm. I'm still wonderin
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 02:56:19PM +1000, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
>
> (cough)
>
> I was a bit too soon reporting the sparc-sun-solaris2, two
> attempts have died with stg_ap_v_ret. Same result sparc-*-openbsd.
>
> Here's an updated list:
>
> +-++-
> I was a bit too soon reporting the sparc-sun-solaris2, two
> attempts have died with stg_ap_v_ret. Same result sparc-*-openbsd.
>
> Here's an updated list:
>
> +-++---+
> | HOST| TARGET| Unregisterised bootstra
simonmar:
> dons:
> > No. They are perfect. I've stress tested them today :p
> >
> > +-+++
> > | HOST| TARGET| Unregisterised bootstrap |
> > +-++
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 04 September 2003 01:45, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
> I did something very slightly incorrect, I think, though I don't
> know what it was, because I got a working cross-port to freebsd
> yesterday, on a box that had previously given me the
> Of course, alpha didn't build anyway due to the lack of memory
> allocation (I think) code for generic 64-bit platforms that I
> think was
> mentioned on one of the lists recently.
You might try using the hack I added to MBlock.h for x86_64. It's
admittedly completely bogus, but it hasn't fa
rmartine:
> On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Simon Marlow wrote:
>
> +-+++
> | HOST| TARGET| Unregisterised bootstrap |
> +-+++
> | i386-*-openbsd | i3
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Rafael Martinez Torres wrote:
>
> Could you release a (transient) ghc-6.01-unreg-hc.tar.gz ?
>
Sorry, I read the doc, and I understood the unreg (.hc) tar is built on
host
with a particular target "config.h" .
I have to build it , hence.
__
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Simon Marlow wrote:
+-+++
| HOST| TARGET| Unregisterised bootstrap |
+-+++
| i386-*-openbsd | i386-*-openbsd |
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 10:41:49AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
>
> > | | alpha-dec-osf3 | dies on host with: |
> > | || cc1: Invalid option `ieee' |
> >
> > So all 32-bit platforms have worked or are looking good, but
> > the 64 bit
> simonmar:
> > There's a small possibility that I've missed something out from the
> > instructions, I suppose :)
>
> No. They are perfect. I've stress tested them today :p
>
> +-+++
> | HOST| TARGET| Unre
simonmar:
> There's a small possibility that I've missed something out from the
> instructions, I suppose :)
No. They are perfect. I've stress tested them today :p
+-+++
| HOST| TARGET| Unregisterised bootstr
> Following Donald Stewart efforts and Simon Marlow's new
> porting guide,
> I made two attempts of getting GHC working on Linux/PowerPC.
>
> I made a first attempt using cross-compiling from a Linux/i386 box. I
> followed every instruction on the guide, but the compiler was
> unusable,
> r
dons:
> lunar:
> > I made a first attempt using cross-compiling from a Linux/i386 box. I
> > followed every instruction on the guide, but the compiler was unusable,
> > resulting in the following error message :
> > hc-6.0.1: internal error: stg_ap_v_ret
> > Please report this as a bug to [EM
lunar:
> Hello,
>
> Following Donald Stewart efforts and Simon Marlow's new porting guide,
> I made two attempts of getting GHC working on Linux/PowerPC.
>
> I made a first attempt using cross-compiling from a Linux/i386 box. I
> followed every instruction on the guide, but the compiler was unu
16 matches
Mail list logo
