Simon Marlow schrieb:
> Christian Maeder wrote:
>> Dear Hets- and GHC-Developers,
>>
>> we have a problem using ghc-6.6.1. The created hets binary runs a couple
>> of times slower than the one created using ghc-6.6. (see below)
>>
>> What might be the cause for this?
>
> Very strange. The perform
Christian Maeder wrote:
Dear Hets- and GHC-Developers,
we have a problem using ghc-6.6.1. The created hets binary runs a couple
of times slower than the one created using ghc-6.6. (see below)
What might be the cause for this?
Very strange. The performance has decreased dramatically, but the
Aha! So the problem is a library change rather than a compiler change. That's
a relief.
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
| Behalf Of Christian Maeder
| Sent: 08 May 2007 22:33
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; GHC Users Mailing List; [EMAIL PROTE
You seem to be generating 8x the garbage with the 6.6.1 version which
could account for the 2x slowdown.
On May 8, 2007, at 2:19 PM, Christian Maeder wrote:
ghc-6.6.1:
hets +RTS -H300m -M1g -p -RTS -o prf Basic/Numbers.casl
total time = 1979.05 secs (39581 ticks @ 5
