Hello Ketil,
Wednesday, March 22, 2006, 11:02:49 AM, you wrote:
of course, any complicated algorithm can be a result of long
researches and so we are far from such algorithms. my words is more a
rhetorical point than concrete suggestion. that's real on this moment:
1) tune the ghc algorithm to k
Hello John,
Thursday, March 16, 2006, 4:00:34 AM, you wrote:
JM> the best solution would be for ghc's garbage collector to periodically
JM> call getrusage(2) and look at the number of page faults and swaps it is
JM> causing and switch to compaction when it sees a jump in that.
just some more tho
Hello John,
Thursday, March 16, 2006, 4:00:34 AM, you wrote:
>> i suggest checking of AVAILABLE physical ram, that is perfectly
>> possible in windows
JM> the problem is that available physical ram is wasted ram. any good os
JM> will never let there be any available ram because it will fill it u
Hello Simon,
Monday, March 13, 2006, 3:40:21 PM, you wrote:
>> just to check available PHYSICAL memory he answered that he don't know
>> that is physical memory, only virtual memory matters
SM> I think that's a mischaracterisation of what I said. Actually I said
SM> that I didn't understand yo
