Re: Recompiling the darcs tree after a pull

2006-07-20 Thread Simon Marlow
Joel Reymont wrote: I get a lot of errors like this: utils/Panic.lhs:27:0: Failed to load interface for `Config': Bad interface file: stage1/main/Config.hi mismatched interface file versions: expected 6050, found 390518464 Do you guys always clean after a pull or is t

Re: Recompiling the darcs tree after a pull

2006-07-20 Thread Simon Marlow
Joel Reymont wrote: What I usually do is build GHC from darcs and make-install it. I then do a darcs pull and use the previously built compiler to bootstrap. I guess this is not optimal and I should just use the last stable GHC to recompile the darcs tree. Yes, that isn't a "supported" wor

Re: Recompiling the darcs tree after a pull

2006-07-16 Thread Joel Reymont
What I usually do is build GHC from darcs and make-install it. I then do a darcs pull and use the previously built compiler to bootstrap. I guess this is not optimal and I should just use the last stable GHC to recompile the darcs tree. On Jul 16, 2006, at 10:28 PM, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote

RE: Recompiling the darcs tree after a pull

2006-07-16 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
riginal Message- | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:glasgow-haskell-users- | [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joel Reymont | Sent: 14 July 2006 20:51 | To: glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org | Subject: Recompiling the darcs tree after a pull | | I get a lot of errors like this: | | utils

Recompiling the darcs tree after a pull

2006-07-14 Thread Joel Reymont
I get a lot of errors like this: utils/Panic.lhs:27:0: Failed to load interface for `Config': Bad interface file: stage1/main/Config.hi mismatched interface file versions: expected 6050, found 390518464 Do you guys always clean after a pull or is there an easy way to g