Re: Records in Haskell - namespacing for fields

2012-01-31 Thread John Lask
On 1/02/2012 12:26 AM, AntC wrote: Simon Peyton-Jonessimonpjat microsoft.com writes: Beyond that, it would really help namespacing in general to appropriately extend the module system to allow multiple modules to be declared within a single file -- or, better yet, submodules. [snip] the

Re: Records in Haskell - namespacing for fields

2012-01-31 Thread AntC
John Lask jvlask at hotmail.com writes: On 1/02/2012 12:26 AM, AntC wrote: No! no! no! For records _don't_ put records in nested/sub-modules, and _don't_ require them in separate modules (as currently). Here's how ... namespace management and record systems are intimately related,