On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 03:02:37PM -0700, John Meacham wrote:
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 03:47:04AM +0300, Lauri Alanko wrote:
When I use arrows, I find that many of my primitives are of type (a () b)
(for some arrow type a): they produce a value but don't take any input.
E.g. deterministic
When I use arrows, I find that many of my primitives are of type (a () b)
(for some arrow type a): they produce a value but don't take any input.
E.g. deterministic parsers are like this.
The syntactic sugar for arrows is lovely, but I find it a bit tedious
writing foo - () all the time. The
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 03:47:04AM +0300, Lauri Alanko wrote:
When I use arrows, I find that many of my primitives are of type (a () b)
(for some arrow type a): they produce a value but don't take any input.
E.g. deterministic parsers are like this.
The syntactic sugar for arrows is lovely,
