Dear davean and Mikolaj,
Many thanks for your responses.
I will pass them on to my colleague who may participate to the
discussion himself.
Best wishes,
Sébastien.
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://mail.ha
You may also be interested in the "Hackage Matrix CI" links
on Hackage pages and the non-maintainer updates
of packages performed as part of the service to the community.
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 11:32 AM, Sébastien Hinderer
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am part of the OCaml development team. As you ma
It may be that there’s quite a bit of code that doesn’t have explicit top
level type signatures? That’s legal in Haskell but considered bad style /
bad practice for packages. I’m not sure if the norms in O’Caml reflect the
same inclination. This may complicate localizing type errors
On Thu, May
My experience may not be representative, but I've done waves of updating
packages for a new major GHC release a few times now. I believe for the
AMP-containing update of GHC I submitted patches to over 40 packages. My
experience is far from universal, but I extensive enough to be informative.
In m
Dear all,
I am part of the OCaml development team. As you may know, OCaml has a
package manager a bit similar to cabal whose name is opam.
One of my colleagues spends quite a lot of time trying to make sure that
packages still compile with a new version of the compiler, when we
release it. When a
