On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 11:34 +, Gracjan Polak wrote:
> Duncan Coutts googlemail.com> writes:
>
> > if flag(test)
> > Buildable: True
> > Build-depends: base<5, bytestring, HUnit, directory
> > else
> > Buildable: False
> >
>
> Is this solution good for the time being? I
On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 12:44 +, Simon Marlow wrote:
> > The current Cabal code takes a slightly different approach. It says at
> > the end "oh this exe isn't buildable, so its deps do not contribute to
> > the deps of the package".
> >
> > The problem is what it was doing before that. It sees t
On 20/12/2009 01:46, Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 19:44 -0800, Dave Bayer wrote:
Hi Duncan,
Installation was easy (I typed "cabal-install HTTP zlib
cabal-install" ;-).
Thanks for testing it. I've uploaded it to hackage.
Overall, seems to work fine. I couldn't build darcs, but
Duncan Coutts googlemail.com> writes:
> if flag(test)
> Buildable: True
> Build-depends: base<5, bytestring, HUnit, directory
> else
> Buildable: False
>
Is this solution good for the time being? If so, I'll change it to make peace
and happiness prevail among cabal users.
On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 19:44 -0800, Dave Bayer wrote:
> Hi Duncan,
>
> Installation was easy (I typed "cabal-install HTTP zlib
> cabal-install" ;-).
Thanks for testing it. I've uploaded it to hackage.
> Overall, seems to work fine. I couldn't build darcs, but I couldn't do
> that by hand either;
All,
If you'd like to help test the new cabal-install-0.8 release then grab
it here:
http://haskell.org/cabal/release/cabal-install-0.8.0/
It should work with ghc-6.10 and 6.12 (and indeed 6.8 and 6.6).
If nobody reports any major show stoppers then I'll upload this to
hackage.
Duncan
___
