> Simon Marlow wrote:
> >
> > > It must have been only a warning in 5.02.3, or I could never have
> > > compiled it there. (Before 5.02.3 we didn't use the package
> > > system like this at all.)
> [snip]
> >
> > Can't you just fix your build so that the situation doesn't occur?
> [snip]
> In
Simon Marlow wrote:
>
> > It must have been only a warning in 5.02.3, or I could never have
> > compiled it there. (Before 5.02.3 we didn't use the package
> > system like this at all.)
[snip]
>
> Can't you just fix your build so that the situation doesn't occur?
[snip]
In fact I have been unab
Simon Marlow wrote:
[snip]
> Can't you just fix your build so that the situation doesn't occur?
[snip]
Grumble. Yes, I suppose so.
I hate being an implementor instead of a bug-reporter.
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ww
> It must have been only a warning in 5.02.3, or I could never have
> compiled it there. (Before 5.02.3 we didn't use the package
> system like this at all.)
>
> Actually I would like this message to go away altogether in this case,
> if possible. The actual situation is that GetPut.hs is in fa
Simon Marlow quoted Max Kirillov
[snip]
> > Building htk, I've got an error:
> >=20
> > TestGetPut.hs:6:
> > Module `GetPut' is located in package `Main'
> > but its interface file claims it is part of package
> > `uni-events-test'
> >=20
> > It happened (as far as I got) when ghc saw
> Building htk, I've got an error:
>
> TestGetPut.hs:6:
> Module `GetPut' is located in package `Main'
> but its interface file claims it is part of package
> `uni-events-test'
>
> It happened (as far as I got) when ghc saw in current path
> the *.hi file built for installation. Ther
Hello!
Building htk, I've got an error:
TestGetPut.hs:6:
Module `GetPut' is located in package `Main'
but its interface file claims it is part of package
`uni-events-test'
It happened (as far as I got) when ghc saw in current path
the *.hi file built for installation. There are some
