Dear Hets- and GHC-Developers,
we have a problem using ghc-6.6.1. The created hets binary runs a couple
of times slower than the one created using ghc-6.6. (see below)
What might be the cause for this?
Cheers Christian
ghc-6.6.1:
hets +RTS -H300m -M1g -p -RTS -o prf Basic/Numbers.ca
You seem to be generating 8x the garbage with the 6.6.1 version which
could account for the 2x slowdown.
On May 8, 2007, at 2:19 PM, Christian Maeder wrote:
ghc-6.6.1:
hets +RTS -H300m -M1g -p -RTS -o prf Basic/Numbers.casl
total time = 1979.05 secs (39581 ticks @ 5
Christian Maeder wrote:
Dear Hets- and GHC-Developers,
we have a problem using ghc-6.6.1. The created hets binary runs a couple
of times slower than the one created using ghc-6.6. (see below)
What might be the cause for this?
Very strange. The performance has decreased dramatically, but the
Simon Marlow schrieb:
> Christian Maeder wrote:
>> Dear Hets- and GHC-Developers,
>>
>> we have a problem using ghc-6.6.1. The created hets binary runs a couple
>> of times slower than the one created using ghc-6.6. (see below)
>>
>> What might be the cause for this?
>
> Very strange. The perform
I wrote:
> Dear Hets- and GHC-Developers,
> we have a problem using ghc-6.6.1. The created hets binary runs a
> couple
> of times slower than the one created using ghc-6.6.
This problem is gone when I install and use fgl-5.3 (where "hiding
(indices)" needs to be deleted in Data.Graph.Inductive.Mo
EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: problems using ghc-6.6.1 (due to fgl-5.4.1)
|
| I wrote:
| > Dear Hets- and GHC-Developers,
|
| > we have a problem using ghc-6.6.1. The created hets binary runs a
| > couple
| > of times slower than the one created using ghc-6.6.
|
| This problem is gone when I in
