On 10/05/2020 21:35, Andy Smith via GLLUG wrote:
Hello,
On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 10:03:32PM +0200, Dr. Axel Stammler via GLLUG wrote:
On Sun 2020-05-10 08.53.16, James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
So, I think moving to an "LVM mirror" solution is your best bet for
future extensibility.
I haven't re
On 11/05/2020 10:02, James Roberts via GLLUG wrote:
On 10/05/2020 21:35, Andy Smith via GLLUG wrote:
Hello,
On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 10:03:32PM +0200, Dr. Axel Stammler via GLLUG
wrote:
On Sun 2020-05-10 08.53.16, James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
So, I think moving to an "LVM mirror" solution is
Hello,
I have used several versions of debian, and have found that there are several
networking and DNS resolver packages that could be used by default but
generally do not take over if another is already running, so I end up checking
all unless I know which is the only default. Debian version 1
Hi,
Openvpn should not be grabbing port 53 unless you are using a custom
config for it. The default setup for openvpn is UDP 1194. Some people do
use port 53 UDP for VPn because it allows you to tunnel through, but you
have just seen what havoc that can bring.
If you do need to run OpenVPN t
"...tunnel through firewalls..."
Sorry :-)
On 11/05/2020 11:05, Marco van Beek via GLLUG wrote:
Hi,
Openvpn should not be grabbing port 53 unless you are using a custom
config for it. The default setup for openvpn is UDP 1194. Some people
do use port 53 UDP for VPn because it allows you to t
On Monday, 11 May 2020 11:07:55 BST Marco van Beek via GLLUG wrote:
> > Openvpn should not be grabbing port 53 unless you are using a custom
> > config for it. The default setup for openvpn is UDP 1194. Some people
> > do use port 53 UDP for VPn because it allows you to tunnel through,
> > but you
Hi Chris
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 11:34:31AM +0100, Chris Bell via GLLUG wrote:
> On Monday, 11 May 2020 11:07:55 BST Marco van Beek via GLLUG wrote:
>>> Openvpn should not be grabbing port 53 unless you are using a custom
>>> config for it. The default setup for openvpn is UDP 1194. Some people
>>
Hello,
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 10:22:46AM +0100, John Winters via GLLUG wrote:
> On 11/05/2020 10:02, James Roberts via GLLUG wrote:
> >I haven't reviewed all the recent replies, but is there any reason why you
> >can't add the the two new disks of the same size and migrate from RAID 1
> >to RAID
Hi,
What size are the partitions on the old 8TB disks?
Is it a single partition for all 8TB ?
If you have a separate data from the OS partition:
you could "rsync -avpP" the data/image/picture/whatever files over to
the new disks on top of LVM.
You could handle the OS partition offline.
You can th
On 11/05/2020 11:58, Andy Smith via GLLUG wrote:
...
Yes
I actually think it is possible and is a reasonable plan, though
backups will still be advised. I didn't suggest this at first
because initially we thought there were unequal-sized devices (4T
and 8T).
Same here.
I believe modern mdad
Hi,
On Mon 2020-05-11 13.15.55, Greater London Linux User Group wrote:
What size are the partitions on the old 8TB disks?
Is it a single partition for all 8TB ?
Yes, it is. The system is on a separate hard disk drive.
If you have a separate data from the OS partition:
you could "rsync -avpP
Hi, Andy,
On Sun 2020-05-10 20.35.20, Greater London Linux User Group wrote:
On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 10:03:32PM +0200, Dr. Axel Stammler via GLLUG wrote:
On Sun 2020-05-10 08.53.16, James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
>So, I think moving to an "LVM mirror" solution is your best bet for
>future extens
Hi,
On Mon 2020-05-11 10.02.00, Greater London Linux User Group wrote:
On 10/05/2020 21:35, Andy Smith via GLLUG wrote:
Hello,
On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 10:03:32PM +0200, Dr. Axel Stammler via GLLUG wrote:
On Sun 2020-05-10 08.53.16, James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
So, I think moving to an "LVM m
Hi
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 01:15:55PM +0100, James Courtier-Dutton via GLLUG wrote:
> If you have a separate data from the OS partition:
> you could "rsync -avpP" the data/image/picture/whatever files over to
> the new disks on top of LVM.
> You could handle the OS partition offline.
> You can
Hi,
On Mon 2020-05-11 10.58.13, Greater London Linux User Group wrote:
I believe modern mdadm can reshape a RAID-1 into a RAID-0 then a
RAID-0 into a RAID-10 and then add extra devices.
https://www.berthon.eu/2017/converting-raid1-to-raid10-online/
There will be a scary time when it is RAI
Hi,
And thank you for all contributions.
On Mon 2020-05-11 19.40.15, Greater London Linux User Group wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 01:15:55PM +0100, James Courtier-Dutton via GLLUG wrote:
If you have a separate data from the OS partition:
you could "rsync -avpP" the data/image/picture/what
On 11/05/2020 20:14, Dr. Axel Stammler via GLLUG wrote:
[snip]
I feel rather nervous as I am about to do all this, and I do have some
questions (see below).
[snip detailed steps]
I wouldn't do it that way. Possibly someone else can tell us a reason
why it's worth moving the RAID functionali
Hi,
I forgot another obvious question.
Which filesystem are you using on the old 8TB disk?
For example, if it is btrfs, you don't have to copy anything about.
btrfs does its own raid 0.
You can just add more disks as you need them and btrfs just uses them.
Kind Regards
James
--
GLLUG mailing l
18 matches
Mail list logo
