Hi All,
We have the feature page for Gluster compliance & Archive in gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Features/gluster_compliance_archive
Would like thank Luis, Vivek, Jeff, Dan, Vijay and Kaleb for the valuable
reviews/comments/discussions
that helped in ref
On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 12:11:07PM -0400, Justin Clift wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > Reminder!!!
> >
> > The weekly Gluster Community meeting is in 1 hour, in
> > #gluster-meeting on IRC.
> >
> > This is a completely public meeting, everyone is encouraged
> > to attend and be a part o
Manual resolution of split-brains [1] has been a tedious task involving
understanding and modifying AFR's changelog extended attributes. To
simplify and to an extent automate this task, we are proposing a new CLI
command with which the user can specify what the source brick/file is,
and aut
On 08/07/2014 02:05 PM, Ravishankar N wrote:
Manual resolution of split-brains [1] has been a tedious task
involving understanding and modifying AFR's changelog extended
attributes. To simplify and to an extent automate this task, we are
proposing a new CLI command with which the user can s
On 08/07/2014 02:09 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On 08/07/2014 02:05 PM, Ravishankar N wrote:
Manual resolution of split-brains [1] has been a tedious task
involving understanding and modifying AFR's changelog extended
attributes. To simplify and to an extent automate this task, we are
On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 02:05:34PM +0530, Ravishankar N wrote:
>
> Manual resolution of split-brains [1] has been a tedious task
> involving understanding and modifying AFR's changelog extended
> attributes. To simplify and to an extent automate this task, we are
> proposing a new CLI command with
On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 06:57:46PM -0700, Harshavardhana wrote:
> FYI
>
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192420
Nice! Is there a plan to propose glusterfs as a FreeBSD port too?
Thanks,
Niels
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-de
On 08/07/2014 03:06 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 02:05:34PM +0530, Ravishankar N wrote:
Manual resolution of split-brains [1] has been a tedious task
involving understanding and modifying AFR's changelog extended
attributes. To simplify and to an extent automate this task, we
On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 03:17:11PM +0530, Ravishankar N wrote:
> On 08/07/2014 03:06 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> >On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 02:05:34PM +0530, Ravishankar N wrote:
> >>Manual resolution of split-brains [1] has been a tedious task
> >>involving understanding and modifying AFR's changelog
Niels de Vos wrote:
> > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192420
> Nice! Is there a plan to propose glusterfs as a FreeBSD port too?
That remind me I did not commit NetBSD's package for cmockery. I just
did it.
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
m...@netbsd.org
Hi
I mount a GlusterFS volume to the path ”/mnt/ext3_rv”, I use “cp”
command to copy different srcFiles to the same dstFile “/mnt/ext3_rv/test.iso”
at one time, after copy, the dstFile”test.iso” is not any of my srcFiles, how
to resolve the multiple write problem.
Any response is apprec
Just to clarify a little, there are two cases where I was evaluating
performance.
1) The first case that Pranith was working involved 20-nodes with
4-processors on each node for a total of 80-processors. Each processor
does its own independent i/o. These files are roughly 100-200MB each
and
My apologies. I did some additional testing and realized that my timing
wasn't right. I believe that after I do the write, NFS caches the data
and until I close and flush the file, the timing isn't correct.
I believe the appropriate timing is now 38-seconds for NFS and
60-seconds for gluster.
- Original Message -
> FYI
>
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192420
Cool. :)
+ Justin
--
GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org
An open source, distributed file system scaling to several
petabytes, and handling thousands of clients.
My personal twitter: twitter.com/re
- Original Message -
> Hello,
>
> I'm Vipul. I'm currently in my final year of computer engineering and would
> like some guidance on choosing an academic project to spend 2-3 months
> working on it. I've got a little experience in some internal Glusterfs
> components. But overall, I'm int
On 08/07/2014 12:22 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Hi
NetBSD now passes most of tests/basic/afr, but I still have a failure
here in tests/basic/aft/self-heal.t. This command gets "" and cause a
failure later in "check heal has happened in the correct direction":
GFID=$(gf_get_gfid_xattr $B1/br
Ravishankar N wrote:
> This is a mistake in the testcase, it has to be GFID=$(gf_get_gfid_xattr
> $B0/brick1/file) . Would you like to send a patch to fix it?
Sure, Shall I replace all occurences of $B1 by $B0? There is a B1
definition in tests/snapshot.rc:
tests/snapshot.rc:if [ "$B1" = ""
On 08/07/2014 10:35 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Ravishankar N wrote:
This is a mistake in the testcase, it has to be GFID=$(gf_get_gfid_xattr
$B0/brick1/file) . Would you like to send a patch to fix it?
Sure, Shall I replace all occurences of $B1 by $B0? There is a B1
definition in tests/snap
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 06:57:46PM -0700, Harshavardhana wrote:
>> FYI
>>
>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192420
>
> Nice! Is there a plan to propose glusterfs as a FreeBSD port too?
>
Yes, that is currently being handled
David,
Is it possible to profile the app to understand the block sizes used for
performing write() (using strace, source code inspection etc)? The block
sizes reported by gluster volume profile is measured on the server side and
is subject to some aggregation by the client side write-behind xlator.
Harshavardhana wrote:
> Thanks to Manu we are able to get some regression tests running.
NetBSD now completes basic/afr. Do you have other successes?
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
m...@netbsd.org
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluste
I could give you the size of the data done with each "write" statement in our
fortran code if that is helpful. It is a fortran code with write statements
inside a do-loop. I can give you the size of the writes along with the number
if writes if that is helpful.
> You could also enable the io-s
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> Harshavardhana wrote:
>
>> Thanks to Manu we are able to get some regression tests running.
>
> NetBSD now completes basic/afr. Do you have other successes?
>
>
Yes 'meta.t' and bunch of other things work properly. There are many
bugs tha
Hello everyone,
Here we provide some basic backgrounds in addition to the manpages at
http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php?title=Features/disk-encryption
Comments, questions, any your experience are welcome.
Thanks,
Edward.
Transparent encryption and authentic
Ravishankar N wrote:
> Don't think that is needed. B1 could be a valid argument. CC'ing Avra
> just to be sure.
Um, we also have $B2 to $B6, which are sometime correctly defined,
sometime not. The places where definition exist suggest we should have
B$i=/d/backends/$i
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http
Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> Um, we also have $B2 to $B6, which are sometime correctly defined,
> sometime not. The places where definition exist suggest we should have
> B$i=/d/backends/$i
And what about basic/mgmt_v3-locks.t ?
It uses $B1, $B2, $B3, $H1, $H2 and $H3 without ever defining them.
P
Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> And what about basic/mgmt_v3-locks.t ?
> It uses $B1, $B2, $B3, $H1, $H2 and $H3 without ever defining them.
> Perhaps this is why that specific test randomly fails?
I was wrong, this is defined in cluster.rc:
eval "H$i=${CLUSTER_PFX}.$i";
(...)
eval "B$i=$B0/$i";
Thi
FreeBSD can vote as part of smoke tests, just like NetBSD.
Happy Porting!
--
Religious confuse piety with mere ritual, the virtuous confuse
regulation with outcomes
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://supercolony.gluster.org/
On 08/08/2014 08:52 AM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
And what about basic/mgmt_v3-locks.t ?
It uses $B1, $B2, $B3, $H1, $H2 and $H3 without ever defining them.
Perhaps this is why that specific test randomly fails?
I was wrong, this is defined in cluster.rc:
eval "H$i=${CLU
On 08/08/2014 11:01 AM, Avra Sengupta wrote:
On 08/08/2014 10:07 AM, Ravishankar N wrote:
On 08/08/2014 08:52 AM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
And what about basic/mgmt_v3-locks.t ?
It uses $B1, $B2, $B3, $H1, $H2 and $H3 without ever defining them.
Perhaps this is why tha
On 08/08/2014 10:07 AM, Ravishankar N wrote:
On 08/08/2014 08:52 AM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
And what about basic/mgmt_v3-locks.t ?
It uses $B1, $B2, $B3, $H1, $H2 and $H3 without ever defining them.
Perhaps this is why that specific test randomly fails?
I was wrong,
31 matches
Mail list logo
