On 09/07/2014 06:21 AM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> Hi
>
> I try getting tests/basic/pump.t to pass on NetBSD, but after a few
> experiments, it seems the brick replace functionality is just broken.
>
> I run that steps one by one on a fresh install:
>
> netbsd0# glusterd
> netbsd0# $CLI volume
On 09/07/2014 10:01 AM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> How am I supposed to address this?
>
> # gluster volume status gfs352
> Another transaction is in progress. Please try again after sometime.
>
> Retrying after some time does not help. The glusterd log file at least
> tells me who the culprit is
How am I supposed to address this?
# gluster volume status gfs352
Another transaction is in progress. Please try again after sometime.
Retrying after some time does not help. The glusterd log file at least
tells me who the culprit is:
[2014-09-07 04:20:25.820379] E [glusterd-utils.c:153:glusterd_
Hi
I have a lot of log messages about this:
[2014-09-07 04:07:41.323747] W [rpc-clnt.c:1340:rpc_clnt_record]
0-gfs352-client-3: truncating grouplist from 500 to 87
This is produced here:
/* The number of groups and the size of lk_owner depend on oneother.
* We can truncate the g
Hi
I try getting tests/basic/pump.t to pass on NetBSD, but after a few
experiments, it seems the brick replace functionality is just broken.
I run that steps one by one on a fresh install:
netbsd0# glusterd
netbsd0# $CLI volume create $V0 $H0:$B0/${V0}0
volume create: patchy: success: please sta
>
> Right, but that is a bug fixed in master but still present in
> release-3.6, isn't it? Why not backport that change to release-3.6?
>
> The patch will not apply cleanly, it requires previous changes, but
> perhaps it is worth working on it?
>
>
That is left to the changeset owner, perhaps it w
On 09/06/2014 05:55 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
>
> On 09/05/2014 03:51 PM, Kaushal M wrote:
>> GlusterD performs the following functions as the management daemon for
>> GlusterFS:
>> - Peer membership management
>> - Maintains consistency of configuration data across nodes
>> (distribute
Justin Clift wrote:
> Does this mean we'll need to learn Go as well as C and Python?
> If so, that doesn't sound completely optimal. :/
I agree with that. Fancy new languages are cool and full of nice
features, but they reduce the amount of possible contributors. If you
feel you have too many st
Harshavardhana wrote:
> This is the change, you need this patch. Since it isn't committed to
> release-3.6 - you shouldn't be using master regression tests on release-3.6
Right, but that is a bug fixed in master but still present in
release-3.6, isn't it? Why not backport that change to release-
On 09/05/2014 03:51 PM, Kaushal M wrote:
GlusterD performs the following functions as the management daemon for
GlusterFS:
- Peer membership management
- Maintains consistency of configuration data across nodes
(distributed configuration store)
- Distributed command execution (orchestration)
10 matches
Mail list logo
