Hi all,
As it happens every year, the processes for GSOC begin in February,
starting with the organization registration, which runs this year from
February 9th to 20th. Rest of the timeline can be viewed at [1].
Last year we participated in GSOC under the Fedora organization, we hadn't
registered
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 02:10:17AM +0100, Csaba Henk wrote:
> Hi Niels,
>
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 10:08:20PM +0530, Ramana Raja wrote:
> >> 1) How would the above suggestion impact gfapi access?
> >
> > gfapi uses the GlusterFS protocol.
Hi All,
As we approach feature freeze for 3.7 (28th Feb), it would great to have
a status update for features being worked on for the release.
Action(s) needed for status updates:
1. If you are the owner for one of the features listed in the planning
page [1], can you please update status of
On 2015-01-27 11:49, Vijay Bellur wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> As we approach feature freeze for 3.7 (28th Feb), it would great to
> have a status update for features being worked on for the release.
Not exactly a new feature, but something I would like to see happen:
[Gluster-devel] Glusterd daemon mana
Hi all,
This meeting is scheduled for anyone that is interested in learning more
about, or assisting with the Bug Triage.
Meeting details:
- location: #gluster-meeting on Freenode IRC
- date: every Tuesday
- time: 12:00 UTC, 13:00 CET (run: date -d "12:00 UTC")
- agenda: https://public.pad.fsfe.o
Glusterd daemon management code refactoring is being worked on.
See http://review.gluster.org/9428 (and dependent patches) for
current status. I have added you to the list of reviewers. Hope that
is OK with you.
- Original Message -
> On 2015-01-27 11:49, Vijay Bellur wrote:
> > Hi All,
>
Hi,
I've just discovered that EXPECT, EXPECT_WITHIN and others have a bug
that can hide some failures.
The problem is that the test is made using a regular expression
comparison. For example, EXPECT checks this:
if ! [[ "$a" =~ $e ]]; then
There are some tests that use a regular expres
Hi Kiran,
quota.t failure issue has been fixed with patch
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/9410/. Can you please re-try the test with
this patch and see if it works?
Thanks,
Vijay
On Wednesday 19 November 2014 10:32 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On 11/19/2014 10:30 AM, Atin Mukherjee wr
Hi Kiran,
Testcase './tests/basic/quota-anon-fd-nfs.t' is removed from the test
suite.There are some issues with this testcase, we are working on it. We
will add this test-case soon once the issue is fixed.
Thanks,
Vijay
On Tuesday 27 January 2015 06:11 PM, Vijaikumar M wrote:
Hi Kiran,
q
glusterfs-3.6.2 has been released.
The release source tar file and packages for Fedora {20,21,rawhide},
RHEL/CentOS {5,6,7}, Debian {wheezy,jessie}, Pidora2014, and Raspbian
wheezy are available at
http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.6/3.6.2/
(Ubuntu packages will be availab
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 12:07:35PM +0100, Niels de Vos wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This meeting is scheduled for anyone that is interested in learning more
> about, or assisting with the Bug Triage.
>
> Meeting details:
> - location: #gluster-meeting on Freenode IRC
> - date: every Tuesday
> - time: 12:
Hi,
Lalatendu Mohanty, Niels de Vos, and myself will be holding GlusterFS
Office Hours at FOSDEM.
Look for us at the CentOS booth, from 16h00 to 17h00 on Saturday, 31
January.
FOSDEM is taking place this weekend, 31 Jan and 1 Feb, at ULB Solbosch
Campus, Brussels. FOSDEM is a free event, n
Turning off nfslock did not help. Also, still getting these messages
every 3-seconds:
[2015-01-27 14:16:12.921880] W [socket.c:611:__socket_rwv] 0-management:
readv on /var/run/1f0cee5a2d074e39b32ee5a81c70e68c.socket failed
(Invalid argument)
[2015-01-27 14:16:15.922431] W [socket.c:611:__soc
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 12:35:35PM +0100, Xavier Hernandez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just discovered that EXPECT, EXPECT_WITHIN and others have a bug that
> can hide some failures.
>
> The problem is that the test is made using a regular expression comparison.
> For example, EXPECT checks this:
>
>
Hi,
I had a similar problem once. It happened after doing some unrelated
tests with NFS. I thought it was a problem I generated doing weird
things, so I didn't investigate the cause further.
To see if this is the same case, try this:
* Unmount all NFS mounts and stop all gluster volumes
* Ch
Hi,
Here is the current state of multi-thread epoll patch,
1) Patches:
epoll patch: http://review.gluster.org/#/c/3842/
epoll configuration patch: http://review.gluster.org/#/c/9488/
2) Failures:
- epoll patch
- In 2 runs the following 2 test cases failed in separate instances,
- ./tests/
After shutting down all NFS and gluster processes, there was still an
NFS process.
[root@gfs01bkp ~]# rpcinfo -p
program vers proto port service
104 tcp111 portmapper
103 tcp111 portmapper
102 tcp111 portmapper
104 udp
Hi Niels,
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 10:08:20PM +0530, Ramana Raja wrote:
>> 1) How would the above suggestion impact gfapi access?
>
> gfapi uses the GlusterFS protocol. When access through the protocol is
> denied, only clients from within th
I rebooted the machine to see if the problem would return and it does.
Same issue after a reboot.
Any suggestions?
One other thing I tested was to comment out the NFS mounts in
/etc/fstab:
# gfsib01bkp.corvidtec.com:/homegfs_bkp /backup_nfs/homegfs nfs
vers=3,intr,bg,rsize=32768,wsize=32768 0
David,
can you stop glusterfs on affected machine and remove gluster related
socket extension files from /var/run ? Start glusterfs service again and
try once more ?
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 5:57 PM, David F. Robinson <
david.robin...@corvidtec.com> wrote:
> Tried shutting down glusterd and glus
In my /etc/fstab, I have the following:
gfsib01bkp.corvidtec.com:/homegfs_bkp /backup/homegfs
glusterfs transport=tcp,_netdev 0 0
gfsib01bkp.corvidtec.com:/Software_bkp /backup/Software
glusterfs transport=tcp,_netdev 0 0
gfsib01bkp.corvidtec.com:/Source_bkp /b
Not elegant, but here is my short-term fix to prevent the issue after a
reboot:
Added 'noauto' to the mount in /etc/rc.local:
/etc/fstab:
#... Note: Used the 'noauto' for the NFS mounts and put the mount in
/etc/rc.local to ensure that
#... glsuter has been started before attempting to mount u
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:39:52, Niels de Vos wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 02:10:17AM +0100, Csaba Henk wrote:
> > Does it mean that the implementation of feature would essentially boil
> > down
> > to an auth ruleset calculated by glusterfs?
>
> I guess that depends on the goal of the feature.
== Code being written
* Tiering / data classification (Dan and Joseph)
* NSR (me)
== Designs still progressing but no code
* GlusterD.next (KP)
* DHT.next (Shyam)
* Caching (Xavier)
== Some interest, but no resources
* Sharding
* Split/multiple networks
* Better brick management
* Comp
Hi Niels,
I see no kernel NFS service running on the gluster node.
Here are the output
root@glusterprod001:~# rpcinfo
program version netid addressserviceowner
104tcp6 ::.0.111 portmapper superuser
103tcp6 ::.0.11
data classification has been updated to better reflect cache tiering's current
status.
- Original Message -
> From: "Jeff Darcy"
> To: "Gluster Devel"
> Sent: Monday, January 26, 2015 7:53:37 AM
> Subject: [Gluster-devel] GlusterFS 4.0 updates needed
>
> Ahead of Wednesday's community
Hi,
I want to known why net recv 91MB/s, read only 22MB/s when do FIO read
test.
when I set cache-size=2GB or disable open-behind, this phenomenon
disappears.
thanks.
gluster 3.4.5 (default configure)
centos 6.5
replica 2, 2 server
client do FIO test
FIO command:
fio -directory
Hi All,
This is regarding quota accounting for hard-links. Currently, accounting
is done only once for the links created within the same directory and
accounting is done separately when links are created in separate directory.
With this approach account may go wrong when rename is performed on
28 matches
Mail list logo
