On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 08:29:49PM +, Csaba Henk wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:39:52, Niels de Vos wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 02:10:17AM +0100, Csaba Henk wrote:
> > > Does it mean that the implementation of feature would essentially boil
> > > down
> > > to an auth ruleset calculate
Background
--
We have `status` and `status detail` commands for GlusterFS
geo-replication, This mail is to fix the existing issues in these
command outputs. Let us know if we need any other columns which helps
users to get meaningful status.
Existing output
---
Status comm
Hi all,
In about 30 minutes from now we will have the regular weekly Gluster
Community meeting.
Meeting details:
- location: #gluster-meeting on Freenode IRC
- date: every Wednesday
- time: 7:00 EST, 12:00 UTC, 13:00 CET, 17:30 IST (in your terminal,
run: date -d "12:00 UTC")
- agenda: avail
Hi All,
Thanks to everyone who responded to the recent community survey [1], we
have an idea of what you think would be necessary in GlusterFS. I have
tried to collate the wishlist of features under appropriate categories
here [2].
As a continuation of this, the approaching feature freeze fo
Hearing all the prev discussions, thinking more about this requirement
there are a few different scenarios here and this is my take on them:
1) Scenario 1: ganesha server running inside glusterfs TSP (trusted storage
pool) - we just need to use the option to turn off glusterfs protocol
2) Scenari
I vote for 3) Just tell people in documentation that hard links do not behave
the way you would expect with quotas and if they don't like it they can go
pound sand. What percentage of storage space consists of files with hard
links to them? < 1% right?If so, why deform the quota design t
An update:
On 01/27/2015 10:14 AM, Shyam wrote:
Hi,
Here is the current state of multi-thread epoll patch,
1) Patches:
epoll patch: http://review.gluster.org/#/c/3842/
epoll configuration patch: http://review.gluster.org/#/c/9488/
2) Failures:
- epoll patch
- In 2 runs the following 2 tes
Hi Niels,
- Original Message -
> From: "Niels de Vos"
> To: "Csaba Henk"
> Cc: gluster-devel@gluster.org
> Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 9:19:34 AM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Ability to turn off 'glusterfs' protocol
>
> The High-Availability NFS-Ganesha design puts the NFS-Gane
We noticed a VERY strange NFS issue with sqlplus.
When we have the tnsnames.ora sitting on a gluster NFS mount. Sqlplus plus
throw out error for
ERROR:
ORA-12154: TNS:could not resolve the connect identifier specified
It works fine it the tnsnames.ora on local file systems or any other NFS
ser
We were able to stop the lockd error after rebooted the server.
However still encountering another strange issue with sqlplus.
I sent another email to the group on it.
Thanks
Peter
From: gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org [gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org
An object interface to GlusterFS would greatly benefit Swift integration
efforts. Currently swiftonfile project uses FUSE mount to perform I/O on
GlusterFS volumes. Moving to libgfapi would increase performance if there were
an object interface. May be something like this:
glfs_put(object_path,
11 matches
Mail list logo