On 10/05/15 23:59, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
I ran NetBSD regressions on master and I get many new failures. For
whoever is interested:
./tests/basic/afr/sparse-file-self-heal.t
Failed test: 25
./tests/basic/geo-replication/marker-xattrs.t
Failed test: 32
./tests/basic/mount-nfs-auth.t
On 05/11/2015 12:46 AM, Christopher Pereira wrote:
Hi,
Using a replica-2 gluster volume with oVirt is currently not supported
and causes split-brains, specially due to sanlock.
Replica-1 works fine (since split-brains are impossible here) and
replica-3 *should* work or at least reduces the
Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> ./tests/bitrot/br-stub.t
> => hang
Fixed here:
http://review.gluster.org/10748 (master)
http://review.gluster.org/10749 (release-3.7)
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
m...@netbsd.org
___
Gluster-devel mailing
Hi,
Using a replica-2 gluster volume with oVirt is currently not supported
and causes split-brains, specially due to sanlock.
Replica-1 works fine (since split-brains are impossible here) and
replica-3 *should* work or at least reduces the probability of suffering
split-brains (depends on ra
I ran NetBSD regressions on master and I get many new failures. For
whoever is interested:
./tests/basic/afr/sparse-file-self-heal.t
Failed test: 25
./tests/basic/geo-replication/marker-xattrs.t
Failed test: 32
./tests/basic/mount-nfs-auth.t
Failed test: 45
./tests/basic/tier/bug-1214222-
On 10-05-2015 7:30, Niels de Vos wrote:
[...]
This shows two read calls over the network:
1. offset: 0; size: 131072
2. offset: 131072; size: 131072
There are no lseek() requests for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA sent over the
network. Looking into the operations (FOPs) that are available to the
Glu
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 12:11:49AM +0530, Vijay Bellur wrote:
> On 05/09/2015 12:45 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
> >Hi All,
> >
> >Thanks to all our efforts, we are inching closer towards 3.7.0. Here is
> >the updated release schedule for 3.7.0:
> >
> >1. Patch merge deadline and beta2 tagging - 1600 UT
Jeff already made some improvements for the mem-accounting with this
patch:
core: use reference counting for mem_acct structures
http://review.gluster.org/#/q/Id929b11387927136f78626901729296b6c0d0fd7
It has been merged in the master branch and release-3.7. Unfortunately
some very similar
On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 01:00:31PM +0800, 张兵 wrote:
> Hi all,
> I Install gluster in one node,disable gluster nfs and export nfs by kernel
> nfs server,they are in the same linux system;
> another linux client mount nfs path,when dd file on the nfs mount
> point;Sometimes the io return error;
It
On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 05:50:56AM -0300, Christopher Pereira wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I did a local sparse image copy benchmark copying from a gluster mount (of a
> local gluster-server) vs copying directly from the gluster-brick to test
> SEEK_HOLE support and performance.
> Motivation : VM's image file
On 10-05-2015 6:26, Niels de Vos wrote:
Because 'glusterd --xlator-option *.upgrade=on -N' is the command that
failed, I guess that the core was generated during an update process.
It sound possible that the packages got updated because the failing of
the glusterd command was not fatal. HTH, Ni
On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 06:34:55AM -0300, Christopher Pereira wrote:
> Core was generated by `glusterd --xlator-option *.upgrade=on -N'.
> Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
> #0 0x7f489c747c3b in ?? ()
>
> I would like to provide debug info and installed
> glusterfs-debug
Smoke tests aren't being reported back. This is a known issue.
Successful regression runs don't get reported back sometimes due to
the network issues we have. If you have such regression jobs, inform
any person with root access on build.gluster.org. They can manually
run the ssh command which repo
13 matches
Mail list logo