Fix at:
http://review.gluster.com/10929
- Original Message -
> From: "Raghavendra Gowdappa"
> To: "Raghavendra Gowdappa"
> Cc: "Vijay Bellur" , "Gluster Devel"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 8:46:57 AM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Crash in dht_fsync()
>
> During graph change we m
Niels de Vos, I wish to get access to you setup :)
We know that Clang is compiler more than analyzer, it support many
Architectures.
you can have a glance at http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/Triple_8h_source.html
Further Compiling clang from source should not be that difficult in many of the
On 26/05/15 20:44, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 10:17:05AM -0400, Jiffin Thottan wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Vijay Bellur"
To: "Krishnan Parthasarathi" , "Shyam"
Cc: "Gluster Devel"
Sent: Friday, 22 May, 2015 9:49:15 AM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Spurious r
Jeff Darcy wrote:
> As I'm sure you know, security often involves multiple layers. At the
> time, the OpenSSL method table we used was still one that would allow
> fallback to SSLv3.
You refer to using ssl23_client_method()? That function's name is really
bad because it is the only one that al
On 05/27/2015 12:24 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:00:25PM +0530, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
>> On 26 May 2015 17:30, "Prasanna Kalever" wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi gluster team,
>>>
>>> Proposal:
>>>
>>> Using Clang static analyzer tool for gluster project
>>>
>>>
>>> About Clang:
>>>
>>
On 05/27/2015 08:55 AM, Krishnan Parthasarathi wrote:
>> I will encourage to do it before this patch gets into the codebase.
>
> The duplicate peerinfo object issue is different from the problems
> in the current generation number scheme. I don't see why this patch
> needs to wait. We may need t
On 05/27/2015 09:03 AM, Ravishankar N wrote:
Looks like gerrit is down. review.gluster.org is not accessible.
Everything seems to be up and running again.
On 05/27/2015 08:58 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
hi,
git fetch on local repo fails with the following error. I asked
on #g
Looks like gerrit is down. review.gluster.org is not accessible.
On 05/27/2015 08:58 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
hi,
git fetch on local repo fails with the following error. I asked
on #gluster-dev, some of the people online now face the same error.
pk1@localhost - ~/workspace/gerr
hi,
git fetch on local repo fails with the following error. I asked on
#gluster-dev, some of the people online now face the same error.
pk1@localhost - ~/workspace/gerrit-repo (cooperative-locking-3.7)
08:54:14 :( ⚡ git fetch
ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host
fa
> I will encourage to do it before this patch gets into the codebase.
The duplicate peerinfo object issue is different from the problems
in the current generation number scheme. I don't see why this patch
needs to wait. We may need to keep volume-snapshot-clone.t disabled
until the time the duplic
During graph change we migrate all the fds opened on old subvol. In this case
we are trying to migrate fds opened on virtual ".meta" subtree. This has
resulted in crash as these inodes and fds have to be handled differently than
the ones in real volumes.
- Original Message -
> From: "Ra
> > We already exclude CBC, because of the POODLE attack, and that leaves us
> > with 32 ciphers. Excluding DH as well leaves us with only four.
> >
> > AES256-GCM-SHA384
> > AES256-SHA256
> > AES128-GCM-SHA256
> > AES128-SHA256
>
> Why are ECDH ciphers missing? That list has no cipher f
Jeff Darcy wrote:
> We already exclude CBC, because of the POODLE attack, and that leaves us
> with 32 ciphers. Excluding DH as well leaves us with only four.
>
> AES256-GCM-SHA384
> AES256-SHA256
> AES128-GCM-SHA256
> AES128-SHA256
Why are ECDH ciphers missing? That list has no cipher
> the logjam attack comes in two part. One is about downgrading
> cipher choice because a TLS setup allows EWPORT ciphers. glusterfs
> can thwart this by setting ssl.cipher-list to something hardened enough
> (ECDH:DH:!TLSv1:!aNULL!eNULL seems nice);
Our default is already based on HIGH, which exc
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:00:25PM +0530, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
> On 26 May 2015 17:30, "Prasanna Kalever" wrote:
> >
> > Hi gluster team,
> >
> > Proposal:
> >
> > Using Clang static analyzer tool for gluster project
> >
> >
> > About Clang:
> >
> > From a very high level view, Clang has two feat
On 26 May 2015 17:30, "Prasanna Kalever" wrote:
>
> Hi gluster team,
>
> Proposal:
>
> Using Clang static analyzer tool for gluster project
>
>
> About Clang:
>
> From a very high level view, Clang has two features
>
> 1. Clang as a compiler
> 2. Clang as a code analyzer
>
> The Idea hear is to us
Prasanna, have you compared the results to the ones we see via coverity?
-Ira
- Original Message -
> Hi gluster team,
>
> Proposal:
>
> Using Clang static analyzer tool for gluster project
>
>
>
> About Clang:
>
> From a very high level view, Clang has two features
>
> 1. Clang as
hi,
tests/bugs/fuse/bug-924726.t failed in
http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/9553/consoleFull
Could you take a look.
Pranith
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/l
On 26 May 2015, at 16:14, Niels de Vos wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 10:17:05AM -0400, Jiffin Thottan wrote:
> Testing can probably be done by adding a delay in the mount path. Either
> a gdb script or systemtap that delays the execution of the thread that
> handles the mount.
Sounds like thi
Hi,
Niels has filed the following bug as tracker for all the spurious tests that
need a backport from the master branch
to release-3.7: https://bugzilla.redhat.com:443/show_bug.cgi?id=1225077
If your fix needs to be backported to release-3.7, please use 1225077 as the
bug id against your pat
Hi Everyone,
I am trying to look in to the aspect of optimizing GlusterFS with respect
to the underlying file system (mainly EXT4). Could you please let me know
whether any such cross-layer (between GlusterFS and underlying FS)
optimizations have been already done in GlusterFS?
Regards
Toms Vargh
Sorry for the wrong incomplete message sent by mistake earlier.
Hi Sussant,
Extremely sorry for the belated reply. Thanks for your input. We will try
having rebalance then create a set of small files with a random pattern
generation and check where it falls in by DM_TYPE DHT.
I have one shor
Hi Sussant,
Extremely sorry for the belated reply. Thanks for your input. We will try
having rebalance then create a set of small files with a random pattern
generation and check where it falls in by DM_TYPE DHT.
I have one short query:
We were also thinking to use (in case we need ) Translat
Hi All,
Could you please guide us to solve the following DHT and brick layout problem
we are dealing with ? Questions are marked bold.
Problem statement :
1. We have a requirement to achieve maximum write and read performance and
we have to meet some committed performance metrics.
Hi gluster team,
Proposal:
Using Clang static analyzer tool for gluster project
About Clang:
>From a very high level view, Clang has two features
1. Clang as a compiler
2. Clang as a code analyzer
The Idea hear is to use second point i.e Clang as code analyzer and still gcc
will be our def
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 10:17:05AM -0400, Jiffin Thottan wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Vijay Bellur"
> To: "Krishnan Parthasarathi" , "Shyam"
>
> Cc: "Gluster Devel"
> Sent: Friday, 22 May, 2015 9:49:15 AM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Spurious regression: Checking on 3
- Original Message -
From: "Vijay Bellur"
To: "Krishnan Parthasarathi" , "Shyam"
Cc: "Gluster Devel"
Sent: Friday, 22 May, 2015 9:49:15 AM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Spurious regression: Checking on 3 test cases
On 05/22/2015 07:13 AM, Krishnan Parthasarathi wrote:
>
>> Are the fol
On 26 May 2015 18:35, "Avra Sengupta" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> What you are refering with the glusterd being restarted might be true,
but I don't remember if the two different peer addresses were before and
after restarting glusterd, or after restarting glusterd and before/after
peer status. We might ne
On 05/26/2015 03:44 PM, Ravishankar N wrote:
I have $subject @ http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10917/ because we have
only one known failure for this test @
http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/8735/consoleFull
and the tests that failed are `gluster volume stop` and `glus
Hi Louis,
AFAIK, we never tested nfs-ganesha+glusterfs using windows client. May
be it would be good if you can collect and provide packet trace/cores or
logs (with nfs-ganesha atleast in NIV_DEBUG level) on the server side
while you run these tests to debug futher.
Thanks,
Soumya
On 05/25/
Hi,
What you are refering with the glusterd being restarted might be true,
but I don't remember if the two different peer addresses were before and
after restarting glusterd, or after restarting glusterd and before/after
peer status. We might need to re-do this exercise on a rackspace vm to
g
These are my findings regarding the issue KP mentioned with
volume-snapshot-clone.t.
>From what I gathered, the double peerinfo objects issue was observed
only via logs. Additional logging was added to
glusterd_peer_rpc_notify to log the objects address and
peerinfo->hostname . I did the same and
On 05/26/2015 04:05 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This meeting is scheduled for anyone that is interested in learning more
> about, or assisting with the Bug Triage.
>
> Meeting details:
> - location: #gluster-meeting on Freenode IRC
> ( https://webchat.freenode.net/?chann
Hi,
We already are running nightly builds using both clang compile and clang
analyze.
see http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/static-analysis/
On 05/26/2015 08:00 AM, Prasanna Kalever wrote:
Hi gluster team,
Proposal:
Using Clang static analyzer tool for gluster project
Ab
Hi gluster team,
Proposal:
Using Clang static analyzer tool for gluster project
About Clang:
>From a very high level view, Clang has two features
1. Clang as a compiler
2. Clang as a code analyzer
The Idea hear is to use second point i.e Clang as code analyzer and still gcc
will be our defa
Status on crash in dht_fsync reported by Vijay Bellur:
I am not able to reproduce the issue. However I am consistently hitting a
failure in the last test of ./tests/performance/open-behind.t (test 18). The
test reads as:
gluster volume top $V0 open | grep -w "$F0" >/dev/null 2>&1
TEST [ $? -eq
Here is the status on quota test-case spurious failure:
There were 3 issues
1) Quota exceeding the limit because of parallel writes - Merged
Upstream, patch submitted to release-3.7 #10910
./tests/bugs/quota/bug-1038598.t
./tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1161156.t
2) Quoting accounti
Pranith,
I sent a patch to fix the spurious failure in entry-self-heal.t @
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10916/ .
Requesting a review on the same.
-Krutika
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/list
Hi all,
This meeting is scheduled for anyone that is interested in learning more
about, or assisting with the Bug Triage.
Meeting details:
- location: #gluster-meeting on Freenode IRC
( https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=gluster-meeting )
- date: every Tuesday
- time: 12:00 UTC
I have $subject @ http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10917/ because we have
only one known failure for this test @
http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/8735/consoleFull
and the tests that failed are `gluster volume stop` and `gluster volume
delete`. Not able to repro the i
All,
The following are the regression test failures that are being looked
at by Atin, Avra, Kaushal and self.
1) ./tests/bugs/glusterd/bug-974007.t to be fixed by
http://review.gluster.org/10872
2) ./tests/basic/volume-snapshot-clone. to be fixed (partially) by
http://review.gl
- Original Message -
> Pranith/Xavi,
>
> ./tests/basic/ec/ec.t is part of
> https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-spurious-failures
> but is not part of is_bad_test() in run-tests.sh. This has repeatedly
> failed an other independent spurious regression failure fix,
> http://review.glust
I happen to see tests/bugs/nfs/bug-904065.t failing for one of the test
run [1]
I believe this failure has nothing to do with [2]
[1]
http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/9527/consoleFull
[2] http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10820/
--
~Atin
_
Hi
the logjam attack comes in two part. One is about downgrading
cipher choice because a TLS setup allows EWPORT ciphers. glusterfs
can thwart this by setting ssl.cipher-list to something hardened enough
(ECDH:DH:!TLSv1:!aNULL!eNULL seems nice);
Second part is about using pre-computed DH parama
On 05/26/2015 12:02 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote:
Is there a way to get coredump?
Running the same test in a loop seems to trigger the crash (1 out of 40
runs approximately).
I will upload the core to a bz but I figure the above will be faster.
Thanks,
Vijay
- Raghavendra Gowdappa
45 matches
Mail list logo
