Humble has blocked submit/merge access on the glusterfs project for
now. We'll re-enable it once we've fixed the problems.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Kaushal M wrote:
> I'll try temprorarily block merges, so that the repo cannot be changed
> even more.
>
> ~kaushal
>
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015
I'll try temprorarily block merges, so that the repo cannot be changed
even more.
~kaushal
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Kaushal M wrote:
> The review.gluster.org git repository for glusterfs seems to be corrupted.
>
> The gerrit log is complaining about some missing git objects, which is
>
The review.gluster.org git repository for glusterfs seems to be corrupted.
The gerrit log is complaining about some missing git objects, which is
not allow git pulls to happen.
I'll be investigating the problem and keep updating here.
~kaushal
___
Glus
Atin Mukherjee wrote:
> > Looking at the file, I would say that it is missing. Anyone confirm?
> > Shall we call this a bug?
> I can check the code and get back to you tomorrow? Does that work for you?
Sure, no problem.
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
m...@netbsd.org
___
On 11 Jun 2015 23:10, "Emmanuel Dreyfus" wrote:
>
> Atin Mukherjee wrote:
>
> > IMO, any option can only be (re)set if its defined in volume map entry
in
> > glusterd-volume-set.c. You might have to use the respective .key for
that
> > option which might differ some time. In short search
socket.
Atin Mukherjee wrote:
> IMO, any option can only be (re)set if its defined in volume map entry in
> glusterd-volume-set.c. You might have to use the respective .key for that
> option which might differ some time. In short search socket.ssl-own-cert in
> this file and try volume set with its .key
IMO, any option can only be (re)set if its defined in volume map entry in
glusterd-volume-set.c. You might have to use the respective .key for that
option which might differ some time. In short search socket.ssl-own-cert in
this file and try volume set with its .key.
Regards,
Atin
Sent from Sams
Hi
Is there any reason why this fails? (on 3.7.1)
gluster volume set tmp transport.socket.ssl-own-cert \
/etc/openssl/certs/glusterfs.crt
volume set: failed: option : transport.socket.ssl-own-cert does not exist
Did you mean transport.keepalive?
The options are defined in rpc/rpc-transpo
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 04:04:44PM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote:
> Michael installed and configured dnsmasq on build.gluster.org yesterday.
> If that does not help today, we need other ideas...
Just to confirm the problem:
[manu@build ~]$ time nslookup nbslave7i.cloud.gluster.org
;; connection timed
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:25:13PM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:51:52PM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote:
> > I've just checked the online NetBSD slaves again, but they seem to have
> > been configured correctly... Maybe we are hitting a Jenkins bug, or
> > there was a (temp
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:51:52PM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote:
> I've just checked the online NetBSD slaves again, but they seem to have
> been configured correctly... Maybe we are hitting a Jenkins bug, or
> there was a (temporary?) issue with DNS resolution?
DNS resolution is wrecked on build.glu
Hi,
Here is a design proposal for a Gluster client using GFAPI.
Looking for reviews and comments. It is shared publicly with comment
rights for anyone having the link.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yuRLRbdccx_0V0UDAxqWbz4g983q5inuINHgM1YO040/edit?usp=sharing
Thanks!
Raghavendra Talur
___
Hi,
Could you please merge the following release 3.7 patches
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11151/
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11159/
Regards,
Avra
On 06/11/2015 01:24 AM, Avra Sengupta wrote:
Hi,
Could you please merge the following patch:
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11139/
Regards,
Av
Hi all,
Yesterday we had our weekly meeting at the usual time, the minutes can
be found below or on these URLs:
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/gluster-meeting/2015-06-10/gluster-meeting.2015-06-10-12.01.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/gluster-meeting/2015-06
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 09:48:22AM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 07:26:00AM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> > In my opinion the fix to this problem is to start new VM. I was busy
> > on other fronts hence I did not watched the situation, but it is still
> > grim, with m
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 07:26:00AM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> In my opinion the fix to this problem is to start new VM. I was busy
> on other fronts hence I did not watched the situation, but it is still
> grim, with most NetBSD slaves been in screwed state. We need to spin
> more.
Launchi
The only strange thing what I see in the log is :
[2015-06-10 18:46:00.618093] E
[glusterd-rebalance.c:927:glusterd_defrag_event_notify_handle]
0-management: Failed to update status
[2015-06-10 18:46:00.620537] W [socket.c:642:__socket_rwv] 0-management:
readv on
/var/run/gluster/gluster-rebalance
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 11:23:03AM +0530, Soumya Koduri wrote:
>
>
> On 06/11/2015 04:29 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> >On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:42:27PM +0530, Jiffin Tony Thottan wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>In the current implementation of access-control translator, it takes care
> >>of the following
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:57:58PM +0530, Kaushal M wrote:
> The problem was nbslave71. It used to be picked first for all changes
> and would fail instantly. I've disabled it now. The other slaves are
> working correctly.
Saddly the Jenkins upgrade did not help here. Last time I investigated
the
The problem was nbslave71. It used to be picked first for all changes
and would fail instantly. I've disabled it now. The other slaves are
working correctly.
~kaushal
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:39:43PM +0530, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
>> Ca
Hi,
[related issues]
While trying to do a git pull , I got some weird errors like this:
error: RPC failed; result=7, HTTP code = 0
fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly.
Also, http://review.gluster.org seems to be VERY slow.
I may be wrong, Are we getting into these issues due to NEW gerri
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:39:43PM +0530, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
> Can we start merging patches with out NetBSD's vote? Currently we have
> so many patches waiting for NetBSD's vote and it seems like no vms are
> apparently running as well. This is blocking us to move forward.
In my opinion the fix
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
> On 06/10/2015 03:24 PM, Venky Shankar wrote:
>>
>> I would like to propose Aravinda (avish...@redhat.com) as a maintainer
>> for Geo-replication. I can act as a backup maintainer in his absence.
>>
>> Hope it's not too late for this proposal.
On 06/11/2015 09:31 AM, Avra Sengupta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> New patches being submitted are not getting NetBSD regressions run on
> them. Even manually they are not getting triggered. Is anyone aware of
> this?
Can we start merging patches with out NetBSD's vote? Currently we have
so many patches wai
24 matches
Mail list logo
