Hi,
I tried running netbsd regression twice on a patch. And twice it failed at
the same point. Here is the error:
snip
Build GlusterFS
***
+ '/opt/qa/build.sh'
File /usr/pkg/lib/python2.7/site.py, line 601
[2015-08-19 05:45:06.N]:++
On 08/20/2015 01:58 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
On 08/19/2015 05:25 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 04:55:07PM +0530, Anoop C S wrote:
Hi all,
Do we have smoke test failure on FreeBSD? Console output displays the
following with master:
install:
On 08/19/2015 05:25 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 04:55:07PM +0530, Anoop C S wrote:
Hi all,
Do we have smoke test failure on FreeBSD? Console output displays the
following with master:
install: /var/db/glusterd/hooks/1/delete/post//S57glusterfind-delete
-post.py: No
On Friday 21 August 2015 10:21 AM, Avra Sengupta wrote:
+ Adding Vijaikumar
On 08/20/2015 04:19 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 03:05:56AM -0400, Susant Palai wrote:
Hi,
I tried running netbsd regression twice on a patch. And twice it failed at
the same point. Here is
+ Adding Vijaikumar
On 08/20/2015 04:19 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 03:05:56AM -0400, Susant Palai wrote:
Hi,
I tried running netbsd regression twice on a patch. And twice it failed at
the same point. Here is the error:
snip
Build GlusterFS
***
+
On Aug 21, 2015 10:22, Avra Sengupta aseng...@redhat.com wrote:
+ Adding Vijaikumar
On 08/20/2015 04:19 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 03:05:56AM -0400, Susant Palai wrote:
Hi,
I tried running netbsd regression twice on a patch. And twice it
failed at the same point.
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 03:05:56AM -0400, Susant Palai wrote:
Hi,
I tried running netbsd regression twice on a patch. And twice it failed at
the same point. Here is the error:
snip
Build GlusterFS
***
+ '/opt/qa/build.sh'
File /usr/pkg/lib/python2.7/site.py, line 601
https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-netbsd7-regression-triggered/9480/console
- Original Message -
From: Susant Palai spa...@redhat.com
To: Emmanuel Dreyfus m...@netbsd.org
Sent: Thursday, 20 August, 2015 2:14:11 PM
Subject: Re: Netbsd build failure
And there is a new failure
Suggestion for future: More granular auto-delete for snapshots. Something
like a sliding window. For eg. Keep hourly snapshots for last one day,
daily snapshots for the past week, weekly ones for the month etc. i.e.
Tapering frequency as you go further in the past. Right now, I think it's
just a
All,
I do not see build for 3.7 after 27th July
@http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/nightly/glusterfs-3.7/
Is there an alternate location for the nightly build for 3.7?
Regards,
Vivek
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Hi Atin
Any news on this one?
KR
Davy
On 12 Aug 2015, at 16:41, Atin Mukherjee
atin.mukherje...@gmail.commailto:atin.mukherje...@gmail.com wrote:
Davy,
I will check this with Kaleb and get back to you.
-Atin
Sent from one plus one
On Aug 12, 2015 7:22 PM, Davy Croonen
Dear Susant,
The rebalance failed again and also had (in my opinion) excessive RAM usage.
Please find a very detailled list below.
All logs:
http://wikisend.com/download/651948/allstores.tar.gz
Thank you for letting me know how I could successfully complete the rebalance
process.
The fedora
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 12:49:35PM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote:
This looks again like a NetBSD slave where logs from regression tests
are overwriting random files. The /usr/pkg/lib/python2.7/site.py file
should be valid Python, and not contain these logs...
n idea: it writes log to the wrong
Infra team,
Given that the regression is always overloaded and spurious failures are
always haunting us, can we try this out? We should also try to have a
separate smoke verified flag just to give enough confidence to the
reviewers as Jeff pointed out in this thread.
-Atin
Sent from one plus one
14 matches
Mail list logo
