#927415 VERIFIED - jv...@redhat.com - Remove the QuickSlave IO implementation
from the GlusterFileSystem class
** No change posted, but bug is in VERIFIED **
#927420 VERIFIED - bchi...@redhat.com - GlusterFileSystem.append() throws
IOException if called
** No change posted, but bug is in
Kaleb KEITHLEY writes:
> On 12/03/2015 03:10 PM, Ira Cooper wrote:
>> Poornima Gurusiddaiah writes:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Brief Background:
>>>
>>> For the below two features, we need ligfapi to take 2 other parameters from
>>> the applications for most number of fops.
>>> http:/
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 09:11:34AM -0500, Poornima Gurusiddaiah wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Brief Background:
>
> For the below two features, we need ligfapi to take 2 other parameters from
> the applications for most number of fops.
> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/12014/
> http://review.g
Hi All,
Meeting logs from this week's community meeting are available at the
locations mentioned below. The meeting minutes have also been added to
the end of this mail.
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/gluster-meeting/2015-12-02/gluster_community_weekly.2015-12-02-12.01.html
Minu
On 12/03/2015 03:10 PM, Ira Cooper wrote:
> Poornima Gurusiddaiah writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Brief Background:
>>
>> For the below two features, we need ligfapi to take 2 other parameters from
>> the applications for most number of fops.
>> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/12014/
>> h
Poornima Gurusiddaiah writes:
> Hi,
>
> Brief Background:
>
> For the below two features, we need ligfapi to take 2 other parameters from
> the applications for most number of fops.
> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/12014/
> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11980/
>
> For leases to
On 3 December 2015 at 20:24, Niels de Vos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's been brought to my notice (several times now) that the current name
> of the repository [1] where we post our work in progress, finished
> designs and other technical specification, does not have a suitable
> name.
>
> If possible, I
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 10:30:49AM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 03:26:27PM +0100, Niels de Vos wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 08:26:45PM -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, December 02, 2015 01:02:00 PM Niels de Vos wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > At the mom
Atin Mukherjee wrote:
> Shouln't the retriggered job be queued up? However if manually any one
> starts using this slave for running private regression run with out
> reserving the slave then it could very well be possible.
Yes, this may be the problem.
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.f
On Thursday, December 03, 2015 10:30:49 AM Brian Foster wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 03:26:27PM +0100, Niels de Vos wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 08:26:45PM -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, December 02, 2015 01:02:00 PM Niels de Vos wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > At the mo
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 03:26:27PM +0100, Niels de Vos wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 08:26:45PM -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Wednesday, December 02, 2015 01:02:00 PM Niels de Vos wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > At the moment it is not possible to set an SElinux context over a FUSE
> > > mount.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015, at 10:25, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 12:26:33PM +0100, Giuseppe Ragusa wrote:
> > The main scope for the present RFE is to allow bandwidth limiting for
> > those cases where peers are clients too (and maybe the only clients),
> > just like in an hyperco
On Wednesday, December 02, 2015 01:02:00 PM Niels de Vos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At the moment it is not possible to set an SElinux context over a FUSE
> mount. This is because FUSE (in the kernel) does not support SElinux.
> I'll try to explain what we need to accomplish to get this working.
>
> 1. mak
-Atin
Sent from one plus one
On Dec 3, 2015 8:24 PM, "Niels de Vos" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It's been brought to my notice (several times now) that the current name
> of the repository [1] where we post our work in progress, finished
> designs and other technical specification, does not have a suitable
-Atin
Sent from one plus one
On Dec 3, 2015 8:12 PM, "Emmanuel Dreyfus" wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 04:53:42PM +0530, Ravishankar N wrote:
> > Does anyone know if there's a possibility that another regression was
> > started when the current one was still running on the same machine in
> >
Hi,
It's been brought to my notice (several times now) that the current name
of the repository [1] where we post our work in progress, finished
designs and other technical specification, does not have a suitable
name.
If possible, I would like to have the repository renamed to either:
a. glust
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 04:53:42PM +0530, Ravishankar N wrote:
> Does anyone know if there's a possibility that another regression was
> started when the current one was still running on the same machine in
> NetBSD?
What happens if you retrigger?
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
m...@netbsd.org
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 08:26:45PM -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 02, 2015 01:02:00 PM Niels de Vos wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > At the moment it is not possible to set an SElinux context over a FUSE
> > mount. This is because FUSE (in the kernel) does not support SElinux.
> > I'll tr
Hi,
Brief Background:
For the below two features, we need ligfapi to take 2 other parameters from the
applications for most number of fops.
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/12014/
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11980/
For leases to work as explained in the above doc, every file da
/tests/bugs/fuse/bug-924726.t failing consistently.
here are the links:
https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/16405/consoleFull
https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/16423/consoleFull
Regards,
Susant
- Original Message -
From: "Dan La
Hi,
arbiter.t failed a regression run at
https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-netbsd7-regression-triggered/12248/consoleFull
The test that failed is:
./tests/basic/afr/arbiter.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 51 Failed: 1) Failed test: 10
which is TEST $CLI volume delete $V0`
But looking at the logs, I f
Hi Sungsik,
We have filed a bug to track this issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287996
Thanks,
Vijay
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 12:31 PM, 박성식 wrote:
> Thanks to Vijay answer.
>
> Volume 'info' and 'cksum' file copy already know.
>
> I wanted to know if there is another solution
Hi,
When we designed and wrote sharding feature in GlusterFS, our focus had been
single-writer-to-large-files use cases, chief among these being the virtual
machine image store use-case.
Sharding, for the uninitiated, is a feature that was introduced in
glusterfs-3.7.0 release with 'experimen
23 matches
Mail list logo
