On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Luis Pabon wrote:
> I think at its simplest would be to specify workflow examples and how
> gdploy+Heketi would satisfy them. I will be sending out some possible
> workflows tomorrow.
>
Awesome, I will see if we can add something to it.
>
> Also, there is a p
I think at its simplest would be to specify workflow examples and how
gdploy+Heketi would satisfy them. I will be sending out some possible
workflows tomorrow.
Also, there is a python Heketi client in the works right now which would
benefit gdeploy: https://github.com/heketi/heketi/pull/251 .
Hi Luis,
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Luis Pabon wrote:
> Hi Sachidananda,
> I think there is a great opportunity to enhance GlusterFS management by
> using gdeploy as a service which uses Heketi for volume management.
> Currently, gdeploy sets up nodes, file systems, bricks, and volumes.
Hi Sachidananda,
I think there is a great opportunity to enhance GlusterFS management by using
gdeploy as a service which uses Heketi for volume management. Currently,
gdeploy sets up nodes, file systems, bricks, and volumes. It does all this
with input from the administrator, but it does no
On 12/10/2015 01:19 PM, Michael Adam wrote:
this one throws core: tests/bugs/unclassified/bug-1034085.t
(but prints "PASS"...)
https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/16713/consoleFull
triggered by
http://review.gluster.org/12930
Collecting ...
Anuradha, since you
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 2:03 AM, Shyam wrote:
> On 12/08/2015 04:32 AM, Vijaikumar Mallikarjuna wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Below is the design for '*GlusterFS User and Group Quotas', *please
>> provide your feedback on the same.
>>
>>
>> *_Developers:_*
>> Vijaikumar.M and Manikandan.S
>>
>>
>> *_
Ravishankar N wrote:
> Thanks Emmanuel, it has run on nbslave74 and passed this time.
Something went wrong on the VM, but if we cannot reproduce it, let us
forget about it :-/
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
m...@netbsd.org
___
Gluste
On 12/10/2015 06:28 PM, Ravishankar N wrote:
I have re-triggered netBSD regression for
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/12936/ Let's see if it fails.
Thanks Emmanuel, it has run on nbslave74 and passed this time. Pranith,
if the patch looks okay, please merge.
--
-Ravi
_
On 12/08/2015 04:32 AM, Vijaikumar Mallikarjuna wrote:
Hi All,
Below is the design for '*GlusterFS User and Group Quotas', *please
provide your feedback on the same.
*_Developers:_*
Vijaikumar.M and Manikandan.S
*_Introduction:_*
User and Group quotas is to limit the amount of disk space for
tests/basic/tier/locked_file_migration.t fails spuriously:
https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-netbsd7-regression-triggered/12602/consoleFull
triggered by
http://review.gluster.org/12938
collecting a few before I try and add more tests to the bad
list...
Cheers - Michael
signature.asc
De
this one throws core: tests/bugs/unclassified/bug-1034085.t
(but prints "PASS"...)
https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/16713/consoleFull
triggered by
http://review.gluster.org/12930
Collecting ...
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
I have made some changes to distaf (github.com/gluster/distaf) project to
suit glusterfs testing more. I want to demo the changes and collect the
feedback.
I will do a hangouts session on Monday, 14th Dec 2015 at 1300 hours
*UTC* (6:30PM
IST). Please attend the event and provide your feedback
Original message
From: m...@netbsd.org
Date:
To: Ravishankar N
Cc: Vijay Bellur ,Susant Palai
,Gluster Devel
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Netbsd failures on
./tests/basic/afr/arbiter-statfs.t
Ravishankar N wrote:
> $ ls -l /dev/rvnd0d
> crw-r- 1 root operator 4
Ravishankar N wrote:
> $ ls -l /dev/rvnd0d
> crw-r- 1 root operator 41, 3 Apr 30 2014 /dev/rvnd0d
>
> Is this good?
Yes it is. And does vnconfig -l reports something sane now?
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
m...@netbsd.org
__
Some more analysis wrt storage space,
"Since support was added to the Linux kernel, there is a hard limit of
64KiB for the size of each extended attribute value, however different
file systems impose additional constraints. For ext2/3/4 and btrfs,
each extended attribute is limited to a file syst
On 12/10/2015 04:23 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Something is rotten on this VM: vnconfig uses a VNDIOCGET ioctl on
/dev/rvnd0d to obtain loopback device lists.
If /dev/vnd0d is a character device with major 41, minor 3, then I
would try to reboot. Otherwise first try to fix that by running MAKED
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 03:49:10PM +0530, Ravishankar N wrote:
> Basically there seems to be an issue with setting up loop back
> devices on NetBSD. Emmanuel, would you know what the problem is?
> +++ vnconfig -l
> vnconfig: VNDIOCGET: Bad file descriptor
Something is rotten on this VM: vnconfi
On 12/09/2015 08:47 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
On 08/24/2015 07:01 AM, Susant Palai wrote:
Ravi,
The test case ./tests/basic/afr/arbiter-statfs.t failing frequently
on netbsd machine. Requesting to take a look.
tests/basic/afr/arbiter-statfs.t seems to be affecting most NetBSD
runs now. Rav
18 matches
Mail list logo
