Jordan Hubbard wrote:
>
> > On Dec 30, 2015, at 2:31 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> >
> >> I'm guessing that Linux uses the event-epoll stuff instead of event-poll,
> >> so it wouldn't exhibit this. Is that correct?
> >
> > Well, both. most (if not all) Linux builds will use event-poll. But,
> > tha
This is not comprehensive data but some interesting bits
Average time taken for various commands in our .t files.
* glusterd - 2 second
* gluster vol start/stop - 3 second
* gluster vol set/info(any basic gluster cli command) -1 second
* gluster mount - 2 second
* gluster add brick - 2 second
* g
Niels de Vos wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 08:12:40PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm been playing with the FreeBSD port of GlusterFS and it seems
> > to be working ok. I do notice that the daemons use a lot of CPU,
> > even when there is nothing to do (no volumes started, etc).
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 08:12:40PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm been playing with the FreeBSD port of GlusterFS and it seems
> to be working ok. I do notice that the daemons use a lot of CPU,
> even when there is nothing to do (no volumes started, etc).
> When I ktrace the daemon, I se
Hi,
I submitted design document for "Eventing framework for Gluster", Please
review.
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13115
Will start POC implementation next week.
--
regards
Aravinda
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://ww
