Hi Atin,
Please answer following doubts as well:
1 .If there is a temporary glitch in the network , will that affect the
gluster brick process in anyway, Is there any timeout for the brick process
to go offline in case of the glitch in the network.
2. Is there is any configurable time out parame
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote:
>> I've been testing release-3.7 in the lead up to tagging 3.7.11, and
>> found that the fix I did to allow daemons to start when management
>> encryption is enabled, doesn't work always. The daemons fail to start
>> because they can't connect to
Hi all,
As we're putting together signage for the community booth at Red Hat
Summit, I wanted to see if the community had ideas for what our tagline
should be.
Right now we have a placeholder for 'Storage Anywhere' on our booth poster,
but what would be better?
Current poster to be finalized by EO
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Amye Scavarda wrote:
> Hi all,
> As we're putting together signage for the community booth at Red Hat Summit,
> I wanted to see if the community had ideas for what our tagline should be.
> Right now we have a placeholder for 'Storage Anywhere' on our booth poster,
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Kaushal M wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Amye Scavarda wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> As we're putting together signage for the community booth at Red Hat Summit,
>> I wanted to see if the community had ideas for what our tagline should be.
>> Right now we have a
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 7:29 AM, Kaushal M wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Kaushal M wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Amye Scavarda wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >> As we're putting together signage for the community booth at Red Hat
> Summit,
> >> I wanted to see if the community
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 5:06 PM, Amye Scavarda wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 7:29 AM, Kaushal M wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Kaushal M wrote:
>> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Amye Scavarda wrote:
>> >> Hi all,
>> >> As we're putting together signage for the community
> I've recently become aware of another problem with own-threads. The
> threads launched are not reaped, pthread_joined, after a TLS
> connection disconnects. This is especially problematic with GlusterD
> as it launches a lot of threads to handle generally short lived
> connections (volfile fetch
Le jeudi 21 avril 2016 à 14:21 +0200, Michael Scherer a écrit :
> Le jeudi 21 avril 2016 à 15:01 +0530, Kaushal M a écrit :
> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Michael Scherer wrote:
> > > Le jeudi 21 avril 2016 à 14:29 +0530, Kaushal M a écrit :
> > >> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Michael Sc
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 4:17 AM, qingwei wei wrote:
> Gluster volume configuration, those bold entries are the initial settings i
> have
>
> Volume Name: g37test
> Type: Stripe
> Volume ID: 3f9dae3d-08f9-4321-aeac-67f44c7eb1ac
> Status: Created
> Number of Bricks: 1 x 10 = 10
> Transport-type: tcp
Le jeudi 21 avril 2016 à 15:01 +0530, Kaushal M a écrit :
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Michael Scherer wrote:
> > Le jeudi 21 avril 2016 à 14:29 +0530, Kaushal M a écrit :
> >> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Michael Scherer wrote:
> >> > Le jeudi 21 avril 2016 à 12:47 +0530, Kaushal M a é
Jiffin Tony Thottan wrote:
>
>
> On 21/04/16 04:43, Rick Macklem wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just to let you know, I did find the email responses to my
> > queries some months ago helpful and I now have a pNFS server
> > for FreeBSD using the GlusterFS port at the alpha test stage.
> > So far I have n
There is some clue I think will be useful,thanks.
(gdb) up
#1 0x7f308ca06098 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6
(gdb) up
#2 0x7f308ca45197 in __libc_message () from /lib64/libc.so.6
(gdb) up
#3 0x7f308ca4c56d in _int_free () from /lib64/libc.so.6
(gdb) up
#4 0x7f308096ebc1 in dh
1008839 (mainline) POST: Certain blocked entry lock info not retained after the
lock is granted
[master] Ie37837 features/locks : Certain blocked entry lock info not
retained after the lock is granted (ABANDONED)
** ata...@redhat.com: Bug 1008839 is in POST, but all changes have been
abandon
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 3:28 AM, Mohammed Rafi K C wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Currently we are experiencing some issues with the implementation of
> readdirp in data tiering.
>
> Problem statement:
>
> When we do a readdirp, tiering reads entries only from cold tier. Since
> the hashed subvol for all
comments are inline.
On 04/22/2016 09:41 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 3:28 AM, Mohammed Rafi K C
> wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Currently we are experiencing some issues with the implementation of
>> readdirp in data tiering.
>>
>> Problem statement:
>>
>> When we do a readdirp,
- Original Message -
> From: "yang bin18"
> To: "Vijay Bellur"
> Cc: "Gluster Devel"
> Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 6:38:07 AM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Glusterfs core report.
>
> There is some clue I think will be useful,thanks.
Did you check about the glibc corruption issue I
17 matches
Mail list logo
