On 06/21/2016 12:05 PM, Hari Gowtham wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Mohammed Rafi K C"
>> To: "Atin Mukherjee" , "Gluster Devel"
>>
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 11:51:13 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Support for Scaling Tier volume, ie Add/Remove
>> brick and Re
I've added my comments in the document. I also feel that getting an
user's experience on the command semantics is much required, so mind to
open this up in gluster-users ML too?
On 06/21/2016 11:31 AM, Mohammed Rafi K C wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The current implementation of Tiering lacks support for reba
- Original Message -
> From: "Atin Mukherjee"
> To: "Mohammed Rafi K C" , "Gluster Devel"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 12:34:12 PM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Support for Scaling TIered volume, ie Add/Remove
> brick and Rebalance
>
> I've added my comments in the document. I a
1279747 (mainline) MODIFIED: spec: add CFLAGS=-DUSE_INSECURE_OPENSSL to
configure command-line for RHEL-5 only
** mchan...@redhat.com: No change posted, but bug 1279747 is in MODIFIED **
1338593 (mainline) ASSIGNED: clean posix locks based on client-id as part of
server_connection_cleanup
[m
Hi all,
This meeting is scheduled for anyone that is interested in learning more
about, or assisting with the Bug Triage.
Meeting details:
- location: #gluster-meeting on Freenode IRC
(https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=gluster-meeting )
- date: every Tuesday
- time: 12:00 UTC
There are two things you need to change for o-direct to be handled properly
in gluster stack:
1) gluster volume set performance.strict-o-direct on
on nfs this option is gluster volume set
performance.nfs.strict-o-direct on
2) gluster volume set network.remote-dio off
Please note that we found
hi,
Is there a plan to come up with an interface for snapshot
functionality? For example, in handling different types of sockets in
gluster all we need to do is to specify which interface we want to use and
ib,network-socket,unix-domain sockets all implement the interface. The code
doesn't ha
Hi all,
I bid adieu to you all with the hope of crossing path again, and the time has
come rather quickly. It feels great to work on GlusterFS again.
Currently we are trying to write data backed up by Commvault Simpana to
glusterfs volume (Disperse volume). To improve the performance, I have
i
Hi,
Thanks a lot everyone for the participation. Here are the minutes of the
meeting:
Meeting ended Tue Jun 21 12:28:38 2016 UTC. Information about MeetBot at
http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot .
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/gluster-meeting/2016-06-21/gluster_community_bug_triage_meetin
Hey!!
Hope you are doing good. I took a look at the bt. So when flush
comes write-behind has to flush all the writes down. I see the following
frame hung in iob_unref:
Thread 7 (Thread 0x7fa601a30700 (LWP 16218)):
#0 0x7fa60cc55225 in pthread_spin_lock () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
<<-
Would https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1233136 be related to
Sachin's problem?
Milind
On 06/21/2016 06:28 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
Hey!!
Hope you are doing good. I took a look at the bt. So when flush
comes write-behind has to flush all the writes down. I see the fo
On 21 June 2016 at 12:38, shwetha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Distaf test framework currently uses a variable 'global_mode' which is for
> selecting the mode in which the tests runs.
>
> When 'global_mode' is set to 'True' we run the tests with the config file
> configuration and ignores 'runs_on_volumes',
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 5:50 AM, Sachin Pandit
wrote:
> Hey Pranith, I am good, I hope you are doing good too.
>
> Please find the comments inline.
>
>
>
> *From:* Pranith Kumar Karampuri [mailto:pkara...@redhat.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 21, 2016 5:58 AM
> *To:* Sachin Pandit
> *Cc:* gluster-
Hi,
Distaf test framework currently uses a variable 'global_mode' which is
for selecting the mode in which the tests runs.
When 'global_mode' is set to 'True' we run the tests with the config
file configuration and ignores 'runs_on_volumes', 'runs_on_protocols'.
When 'global_mode' is set to
Hi,
Distaf currently has a variable 'global_mode' which is used to select
the mode in which the tests runs.
When 'global_mode' is set to 'True' we run the tests with the config
file configuration and ignores 'runs_on_volumes', 'runs_on_protocols'.
When 'global_mode' is set to 'False' we use
Hi,
Distaf currently has a variable 'global_mode' which is used to select
the mode in which the tests runs.
When 'global_mode' is set to 'True' we run the tests with the config
file configuration and ignores 'runs_on_volumes', 'runs_on_protocols'.
When 'global_mode' is set to 'False' we use
Hey Pranith, I am good, I hope you are doing good too.
Please find the comments inline.
From: Pranith Kumar Karampuri [mailto:pkara...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 5:58 AM
To: Sachin Pandit
Cc: gluster-devel@gluster.org
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Reduce memcpy in glfs read and write
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 09:14:58PM +0530, M S Vishwanath Bhat wrote:
> On 21 June 2016 at 12:38, shwetha wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Distaf test framework currently uses a variable 'global_mode' which is for
> > selecting the mode in which the tests runs.
> >
> > When 'global_mode' is set to 'True' w
Second that. That kind of interface would be a great idea although I don't
know how much work that would involve in the snapshot interface redesign..
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
pkara...@redhat.com> wrote:
> hi,
> Is there a plan to come up with an interface f
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
pkara...@redhat.com> wrote:
> hi,
> Is there a plan to come up with an interface for snapshot
> functionality? For example, in handling different types of sockets in
> gluster all we need to do is to specify which interface we want t
Cool. Nice to know it is on the cards.
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Rajesh Joseph wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
> pkara...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> hi,
>> Is there a plan to come up with an interface for snapshot
>> functionality? For example,
Hi Sachin,
Good to see you again in Gluster-devel.
I had implemented those API which I mentioned for a POC. In fact I
couldn't push into master.
Regarding your questions, my comments are inline.
On 06/22/2016 05:50 AM, Sachin Pandit wrote:
>
> Hey Pranith, I am good, I hope you are doing good t
22 matches
Mail list logo
