Here's a proposal ...
Title: State of Gluster Performance
Theme: Stability and Performance
I hope to achieve the following in this talk:
* present a brief overview of current performance for the broad
workload classes: large-file sequential and random workloads,
small-file and metadata-intensiv
On 17/08/16 19:26, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
I propose to present on one or more of the following topics:
* NFS-Ganesha Architecture, Roadmap, and Status
Sorry for the late notice. I am willing to be a co-presenter for the
above topic.
--
Jiffin
* Architecture of the High Availability Sol
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 3:03 AM, Lindsay Mathieson <
lindsay.mathie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 19/08/2016 3:45 AM, Diego Remolina wrote:
>
>> The one thing that still remains a mystery to me is how to downgrade
>> glusterfs packages in Ubuntu. I have never been able to do that. There
>> was also a
In keeping with Fedora, oVirt and some of our other communities with
vibrant content, I'm extending a new proposal around how we can create more
content that gets published on blog.gluster.org.
Here's some new guidelines patterned after those:
## Make Your Proposal
When you are ready to create a
On 19/08/2016 3:45 AM, Diego Remolina wrote:
The one thing that still remains a mystery to me is how to downgrade
glusterfs packages in Ubuntu. I have never been able to do that. There
was also a post from someone about it recently on the list and I do
not think it got any replies.
I would have
The one thing that still remains a mystery to me is how to downgrade
glusterfs packages in Ubuntu. I have never been able to do that. There
was also a post from someone about it recently on the list and I do
not think it got any replies.
Diego
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Joe Julian wrote:
>
Ok, scratch this entire email. I never noticed that the deficiency in
Trusty had been worked around to build the later packages.
On 08/18/2016 10:23 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
On 08/18/2016 01:22 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
On 08/18/2016 01:10 PM, Joe Julian wrote:
I'd like to plead with
On 08/18/2016 01:22 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
On 08/18/2016 01:10 PM, Joe Julian wrote:
I'd like to plead with the community to continue to support 3.6 as a
"lts" release. It's the last release version that can be used on Ubuntu
14.04 (Trusty Tahr) LTS which many users may be stuck using for
On 08/18/2016 01:10 PM, Joe Julian wrote:
I'd like to plead with the community to continue to support 3.6 as a
"lts" release. It's the last release version that can be used on Ubuntu
14.04 (Trusty Tahr) LTS which many users may be stuck using for quite
some time (eol of April 2019).
What's wron
I'd like to plead with the community to continue to support 3.6 as a
"lts" release. It's the last release version that can be used on Ubuntu
14.04 (Trusty Tahr) LTS which many users may be stuck using for quite
some time (eol of April 2019).
___
Glus
- Original Message -
> From: "Niels de Vos"
> To: "Vijay Bellur"
> Cc: "Poornima Gurusiddaiah" , "Dan Lambright"
> , "Nithya Balachandran"
> , "Raghavendra Gowdappa" , "Soumya
> Koduri" , "Pranith
> Kumar Karampuri" , "Gluster Devel"
>
> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 9:32:34 AM
>
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 10:39:40PM -0400, Vijay Bellur wrote:
> Hi Poornima, Dan -
>
> Let us have a hangout/bluejeans session this week to discuss the planned
> md-cache improvements, proposed timelines and sort out open questions if
> any.
>
> Would 11:00 UTC on Wednesday work for everyone in t
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 09:41:22PM +0530, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 August 2016, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > In today's Gluster Community Meeting it was tentatively agreed that we
> > will change how we report the GlusterFS version for glusterfs bugs.
> >
> > Starting
Er, typo. That was supposed to say netbsd7-regression :)
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 12:07:08PM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote:
> > As in the case of CentOS yesterday, the NetBSD job is now
> netbsd6-regression.
>
> But we run regressions o nnetbs
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 12:07:08PM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote:
> As in the case of CentOS yesterday, the NetBSD job is now netbsd6-regression.
But we run regressions o nnetbsd-7 branch. Smoke tests are tun on neybsd-6.
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
m...@netbsd.org
15 matches
Mail list logo
