On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 02:02:43PM -0700, Joe Julian wrote:
> On 08/27/2016 12:15 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 08:52:11PM +0530, Aravinda wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > As part of Client events support, glustereventsd needs to be configured to
> > > use a port. Following ports
Thanks Niels and Joe,
Changed my patch to use 24009. Dynamic port is not required since one
process per node.
24005 is already registered by "med-ci" as checked in /etc/services
regards
Aravinda
On Sunday 28 August 2016 02:13 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 02:02:43PM -0700,
- Original Message -
> From: "Poornima Gurusiddaiah"
> To: "Dan Lambright" , "Nithya Balachandran"
>
> Cc: "Gluster Devel"
> Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 12:56:38 AM
> Subject: md-cache changes and impact on tiering
>
> Hi,
>
> The basic patches for md-cache and integrating it wit
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa
wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri"
> > To: "Rajesh Joseph" , "Manikandan Selvaganesh" <
> mselv...@redhat.com>, "Csaba Henk"
> > , "Niels de Vos" , "Jiffin
> Thottan" , "Aravinda
> > Vishwanathapura
The patch http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15331/ is now ready for merge.
Niels - could you merge it?
On Saturday 27 August 2016, Prasanna Kalever wrote:
> Oops!
> Didn't noticed these changes were part of parent/child patches, Just
> noticed "BUILD BROKEN" and went into action :)
>
> I'm not sure
Hi,
I would like to second this request.
I have Gluster 3.6.6 (which is due for upgrade real soon now) and 3.6.9 in use
under Debian 7 "Wheezy" which itself is LTS until April 2018.
Whilst I plan to upgrade to 3.7 (or even 3.8) at some point; with the needing
to book downtime etc to upgrade
Important happenings for Gluster this month:
3.7.14 released
3.8.3 released
CFP for Gluster Developer Summit open until August 31st
http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/2016-August/050435.html
gluster-users:
[Gluster-users] release-3.6 end of life
http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluste
Maintainers please stop merging patches into release-3.7 till further notice.
If anyone has changes that need to be merged, notify me here before
end of day today.
~kaushal
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Oleksandr Natalenko
wrote:
> [1] and [2], please. Those are 2 parts of one fix that is ba
I've merged this patch to unblock the other patches to go through the smoke
and other regression. Given the volume of patches we have in the pipeline
for 3.9 and we are just couple of days away to 3.9 branching, this needed
an immediate attention.
We now need to rebase all 3.9 targeted patches (th
Hi,
Updated inline.
- Original Message -
> From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri"
> To: "Rajesh Joseph" , "Manikandan Selvaganesh"
> , "Csaba Henk" , "Niels de Vos"
> , "Jiffin Thottan" , "Aravinda
> Vishwanathapura Krishna Murthy" , "Anoop Chirayath
> Manjiyil Sajan" , "Ravishankar Narayana
Hi,
Regarding the enforcement of the dependencies while merging, i see that
the dependent patches on any patch is mentioned in the "Related Changes"
column [1]. It still doesn't enforce, in the cherry-pick way of
submitting changes, by default it ignores the lineage [2]. But there are
ways to e
Hi Pranith,
Please add the following feature of bitrot to 3.9 road map page. It is merged.
feature/bitrot: Ondemand scrub option for bitrot
(http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15111/)
Thanks and Regards,
Kotresh H R
- Original Message -
> From: "Poornima Gurusiddaiah"
> To: "Pranith Kumar
I noticed that these were dependent patches. But, kind of carelessly assumed
that this is parent patch, doesn't have any dependencies and merged. Sorry for
the trouble. Will be more diligent henceforth :)
- Original Message -
> From: "Poornima Gurusiddaiah"
> To: "Prasanna Kalever" , "G
On 08/26/2016 09:38 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
hi,
Now that we are almost near the feature freeze date (31st of Aug),
want to get a sense if any of the status of the features.
Please respond with:
1) Feature already merged
2) Undergoing review will make it by 31st Aug
3) Undergoi
On 08/26/2016 09:39 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 9:38 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri
mailto:pkara...@redhat.com>> wrote:
hi,
Now that we are almost near the feature freeze date (31st of
Aug), want to get a sense if any of the status of the feature
Though its a bit late, here is one from me:
Topic: "DHT: current design, (dis)advantages, challenges - A perspective"
Agenda:
I'll try to address
* the why's, (dis)advantages of current design. As noted in the title, this
is my own perspective I've gathered while working on DHT. We don't have an
-Prashanth Pai
- Original Message -
> From: "Soumya Koduri"
> To: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" , "Rajesh Joseph"
> , "Manikandan Selvaganesh"
> , "Csaba Henk" , "Niels de Vos"
> , "Jiffin Thottan"
> , "Aravinda Vishwanathapura Krishna Murthy"
> , "Anoop Chirayath Manjiyil
> Sajan" , "R
Hello folks,
We have not pruned our Gerrit maintainers list ever as far as I can see. We've
only added people. For security reasons, I'd like to propose that we do the
following:
If you do not have a commit in the last 90 days, your membership from
gluster-maintainers team on Gerrit will be revok
18 matches
Mail list logo
