Re: [Gluster-devel] Spurious regression failure? tests/basic/ec/ec-background-heals.t

2017-01-24 Thread Ashish Pandey
Pranith, In this test tests/basic/ec/ec-background-heals.t, I think the line number 86 actually creating a heal entry instead of helping data heal quickly. What if all the data was already healed at that moment, truncate came and in preop set the dirty flag and at the end, as part of the hea

Re: [Gluster-devel] Priority based ping packet for 3.10

2017-01-24 Thread Joe Julian
Yes, the earlier a fault is detected the better. On January 24, 2017 9:21:27 PM PST, Jeff Darcy wrote: >> If there are no responses to be received and no requests being >> sent to a brick, why would be a client be interested in the health of >> server/brick? > >The client (code) might not, but th

Re: [Gluster-devel] Priority based ping packet for 3.10

2017-01-24 Thread Jeff Darcy
> If there are no responses to be received and no requests being > sent to a brick, why would be a client be interested in the health of > server/brick? The client (code) might not, but the user might want to find out and fix the fault before the brick gets busy again.

Re: [Gluster-devel] Priority based ping packet for 3.10

2017-01-24 Thread Raghavendra G
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 8:06 AM, Jeff Darcy wrote: > >> > The more relevant question would be with TCP_KEEPALIVE and >> TCP_USER_TIMEOUT >> > on sockets, do we really need ping-pong framework in Clients? We might >> need >> > that in tr

Re: [Gluster-devel] Spurious regression failure? tests/basic/ec/ec-background-heals.t

2017-01-24 Thread Raghavendra Gowdappa
Found another failure on same test: https://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/2874/consoleFull - Original Message - > From: "Nithya Balachandran" > To: "Gluster Devel" , "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" > , "Ashish Pandey" > > Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 9:16:31 AM > Subject: [Glust

Re: [Gluster-devel] gluster tiering maintainer

2017-01-24 Thread Vijay Bellur
Hi Dan, Thank you for your contributions to Gluster as a maintainer! Look forward to your continued participation in the community. I am working on a plan for tiering going forward and will share details in the few days. Good luck for your future endeavors! Best, Vijay On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 a

[Gluster-devel] Multiplexing status, January 24

2017-01-24 Thread Jeff Darcy
Coming down to the wire here. Here's the latest. https://review.gluster.org/#/c/14763/ With the latest patchset (61!) I've addressed most of people's review comments. I've also put a dent in the last functional area, which is full support for snapshots. Previously, snapshot bricks were exemp

[Gluster-devel] gluster tiering maintainer

2017-01-24 Thread Dan Lambright
Dear Gluster Community, 2017 has arrived, and I have taken an opportunity which will require a new maintainer for gluster tiering to replace me. I will continue to be available to help with the feature as a contributor. As seen in this year's CES conference [1], new storage types are coming fa