Pranith,
In this test tests/basic/ec/ec-background-heals.t, I think the line number 86
actually creating a heal entry instead of
helping data heal quickly. What if all the data was already healed at that
moment, truncate came and in preop set the dirty flag and at the
end, as part of the hea
Yes, the earlier a fault is detected the better.
On January 24, 2017 9:21:27 PM PST, Jeff Darcy wrote:
>> If there are no responses to be received and no requests being
>> sent to a brick, why would be a client be interested in the health of
>> server/brick?
>
>The client (code) might not, but th
> If there are no responses to be received and no requests being
> sent to a brick, why would be a client be interested in the health of
> server/brick?
The client (code) might not, but the user might want to find out and fix
the fault before the brick gets busy again.
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 8:06 AM, Jeff Darcy wrote:
>
>> > The more relevant question would be with TCP_KEEPALIVE and
>> TCP_USER_TIMEOUT
>> > on sockets, do we really need ping-pong framework in Clients? We might
>> need
>> > that in tr
Found another failure on same test:
https://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/2874/consoleFull
- Original Message -
> From: "Nithya Balachandran"
> To: "Gluster Devel" , "Pranith Kumar Karampuri"
> , "Ashish Pandey"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 9:16:31 AM
> Subject: [Glust
Hi Dan,
Thank you for your contributions to Gluster as a maintainer! Look forward
to your continued participation in the community.
I am working on a plan for tiering going forward and will share details in
the few days.
Good luck for your future endeavors!
Best,
Vijay
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 a
Coming down to the wire here. Here's the latest.
https://review.gluster.org/#/c/14763/
With the latest patchset (61!) I've addressed most of people's review comments.
I've also put a dent in the last functional area, which is full support for
snapshots. Previously, snapshot bricks were exemp
Dear Gluster Community,
2017 has arrived, and I have taken an opportunity which will require a new
maintainer for gluster tiering to replace me. I will continue to be available
to help with the feature as a contributor.
As seen in this year's CES conference [1], new storage types are coming fa