Re: [Gluster-devel] Need inputs on patch #17985

2017-08-22 Thread Raghavendra Gowdappa
Thanks Pranith and Ashish for your inputs. - Original Message - > From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" > To: "Ashish Pandey" > Cc: "Raghavendra Gowdappa" , "Xavier Hernandez" > , "Gluster Devel" > > Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 11:55:19 AM > Subject: Re: Need inputs on patch #17985 > >

Re: [Gluster-devel] Need inputs on patch #17985

2017-08-22 Thread Pranith Kumar Karampuri
Raghavendra, As Ashish mentioned, there aren't any known problems if upper xlators don't send lookups in EC at the moment. On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Ashish Pandey wrote: > Raghvendra, > > I have provided my comment on this patch. > I think EC will not have any issue with this approach

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Brick count limit in a volume

2017-08-22 Thread Vijay Bellur
Can you also please provide more detail on why those many bricks are needed in a single volume? Thanks, Vijay On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 12:43 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > An upstream bug would be ideal as github issue is mainly used for > enhancements. In the mean time, could you point to the exac

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Brick count limit in a volume

2017-08-22 Thread Atin Mukherjee
An upstream bug would be ideal as github issue is mainly used for enhancements. In the mean time, could you point to the exact failure shown at the command line and the log entry from cli.log? On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 12:10 AM, Serkan Çoban wrote: > Hi, I think this is the line limiting brick cou

Re: [Gluster-devel] Need inputs on patch #17985

2017-08-22 Thread Ashish Pandey
Raghvendra, I have provided my comment on this patch. I think EC will not have any issue with this approach. However, I would welcome comments from Xavi and Pranith too for any side effects which I may not be able to foresee. Ashish - Original Message - From: "Raghavendra Gowdappa

[Gluster-devel] Need inputs on patch #17985

2017-08-22 Thread Raghavendra Gowdappa
Hi Ashish, Following are the blockers for making a decision on whether patch [1] can be merged or not: * Evaluation of dentry operations (like rename etc) in dht * Whether EC works fine if a non-lookup fop (like open(dir), stat, chmod etc) hits EC without a single lookup performed on file/inode

Re: [Gluster-devel] statedump support for the new mem-pool implementation

2017-08-22 Thread Niels de Vos
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 04:40:46PM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote: > Hi Raghavendra, > > Soumya mentioned that you have been looking at, or planning to do so, > adding support for state-dumps for mem-pools. Could you point me to the > BZ or GitHub Issue that has been filed for this already? I'd like to