Hi Packaging team,
Preparation for RC0 is ongoing, I am waiting on scores for this patch
[1] (removing experimental code from the release branch) to go through,
and the following items to be resolved before tagging RC0.
Devel/maintainers,
1) https://review.gluster.org/#/c/18785/ needs a backport
Hi,
As release 3.10.10 is tagged and off to packaging, here are the needed
details for 3.10.11
Release date: 28th Feb, 2018
Tracker bug for blockers:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-3.10.11
Shyam
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Glu
Note that live-streaming is available at:
https://fosdem.org/2018/schedule/streaming/
The talks will be archived too.
- Original Message -
> From: "Raghavendra Gowdappa"
> To: "Gluster Devel" , "gluster-users"
>
> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2018 1:32:53 PM
> Subject: [FOSDEM'18] Optimiz
On 01/04/2018 10:43 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As release 3.10.9 is announced, here is are the needed details for 3.10.10
>
> Release date: 30th Jan, 2018
This is today, and the tracker is empty. I will be tagging the release
close to 3:00 PM Eastern (as we wait for the last patch [1
GlusterFS Coverity covscan results are available from
http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/static-analysis/master/glusterfs-coverity/2018-01-30-c142d26e
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman
On 01/30/2018 06:33 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> I am not sure if the advantages outweight the difficulties with
> bundling two projects into one package. My personal preference would be
> to have a glusterd2 package and a glusterfs one, completely separate
> from each other, just with tight Requires:
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 03:37:20PM -0500, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
> This is built on top of glusterfs-3.12. Obviously this will change to
> 4.0 (4.0rc0, etc.) This is derived from the
> .../extras/rpms/glusterd2.spec in the glusterd2 source.
>
> see https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?ta
