+Gaurav
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 2:02 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa
wrote:
> +glusterd devs
>
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 1:41 PM, Storage, Dev (Nokia - Global) <
> dev.stor...@nokia.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi glusterfs experts,
>>
>>Good day!
>>
>>During our recent test
Hi Shyam,
Let me know once it can be tested on the last release of Centos 7. I can
help on this and return some feedback.
Regards,
Javier Romero
Javier Romero
2018-02-26 16:03 GMT-03:00 Shyam Ranganathan :
> Hi,
>
> RC1 is tagged in the code, and the request for
Hi,
RC1 is tagged in the code, and the request for packaging the same is on
its way.
We should have packages as early as today, and request the community to
test the same and return some feedback.
We have about 3-4 days (till Thursday) for any pending fixes and the
final release to happen, so
On 02/19/2018 09:16 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
>> As release 3.10.10 is tagged and off to packaging, here are the needed
>> details for 3.10.11
>>
>> Release date: 28th Feb, 2018
> Checking the 3.10 review backlog, here are a couple of concerns,
>
> 1) Reviews,
> -
Hi folks,
I finally managed to complete the deployment of a High Availiability
reverse proxy for server hosted in the community cage[1]. While the
switch should be invisible to everybody, and likely bring nothing
(except resilience and a better architecture on the system, and maybe
more reason
GlusterFS Coverity covscan results are available from
http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/static-analysis/master/glusterfs-coverity/2018-02-26-a1e59bc8
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
+glusterd devs
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 1:41 PM, Storage, Dev (Nokia - Global) <
dev.stor...@nokia.com> wrote:
> Hi glusterfs experts,
>
>Good day!
>
>During our recent test we found that after execute some glusterfs
> command, there are obvious memory leak found for glusterd