Re: [Gluster-devel] Should we enable features.locks-notify.contention by default ?

2019-05-30 Thread Ashish Pandey
- Original Message - From: "Xavi Hernandez" To: "Ashish Pandey" Cc: "Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan" , "gluster-devel" Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2019 2:03:54 PM Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Should we enable features.locks-notify.contention by default ? On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 9:03 A

[Gluster-devel] Release 5.7: Expected tagging on June 6th

2019-05-30 Thread Hari Gowtham
Hi, Expected tagging date for release-5.7 is on June, 6th, 2019. Please ensure required patches are back-ported and also are passing regressions and are appropriately reviewed for easy merging and tagging on the date. -- Regards, Hari Gowtham. ___ Co

[Gluster-devel] Release 4.1.9 : Expected tagging on June 4th

2019-05-30 Thread Hari Gowtham
Hi, Expected tagging date for release-4.1.9 is on June, 4th, 2019. Please ensure required patches are back-ported and also are passing regressions and are appropriately reviewed for easy merging and tagging on the date. Note: This will be the last release in the 4.1 series as release 7 is around

Re: [Gluster-devel] Should we enable features.locks-notify.contention by default ?

2019-05-30 Thread Xavi Hernandez
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 9:03 AM Ashish Pandey wrote: > > > I am only concerned about in-service upgrade. > If a feature/option is not present in V1, then I would prefer not to > enable it by default on V2. > The problem is that without enabling it, (other-)eager-lock will cause performance issue

Re: [Gluster-devel] Should we enable features.locks-notify.contention by default ?

2019-05-30 Thread Ashish Pandey
I am only concerned about in-service upgrade. If a feature/option is not present in V1, then I would prefer not to enable it by default on V2. We have seen some problem in other-eager-lock when we changed it to enable by default. --- Ashish - Original Message - From: "Amar Tumba