Re: [Gluster-devel] [RFC] inode table locking contention reduction experiment

On 2019/11/4 12:39 下午, Amar Tumballi wrote: Thanks for this, github works for review right now :-) I am occupied till Wednesday, and will review them by this week. A glance on the changes looks good to me. Few tests which can run for validations are :

Re: [Gluster-devel] [RFC] inode table locking contention reduction experiment

Thanks for this, github works for review right now :-) I am occupied till Wednesday, and will review them by this week. A glance on the changes looks good to me. Few tests which can run for validations are : tests/bugs/shard/bug-1696136-lru-limit-equals-deletion-rate.t

Re: [Gluster-devel] [RFC] inode table locking contention reduction experiment

Hi Amar, On 2019/10/31 6:30 下午, Amar Tumballi wrote: On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 4:32 PM Xavi Hernandez > wrote: Hi Changwei, On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 7:56 AM Changwei Ge mailto:c...@linux.alibaba.com>> wrote: Hi, I am recently working on

Re: [Gluster-devel] [RFC] inode table locking contention reduction experiment

Hi Xavi, On 2019/10/30 7:01 下午, Xavi Hernandez wrote: Hi Changwei, On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 7:56 AM Changwei Ge > wrote: Hi, I am recently working on reducing inode_[un]ref() locking contention by getting rid of inode table lock. Just use inode

[Gluster-devel] Weekly Untriaged Bugs

[...truncated 7 lines...] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1762311 / build: build-aux/pkg-version has bashishms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1762175 / core: (glusterfs-5.11)- GlusterFS 5.11 tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1763987 / libgfapi: libgfapi: ls -R cifs /mount_point/.snaps directory