Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Bitrot: Time of signing depending on the file size???

anybody know what is the reason for this? For me it looks loke a bug. > > Regards > David > > Am Fr., 1. März 2019 um 08:58 Uhr schrieb Amudhan P : > >> Hi David, >> >> I have also tested the bitrot signature process by default it takes < 250 >> KB/s. >

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Bitrot: Time of signing depending on the file size???

Hi David, I have also tested the bitrot signature process by default it takes < 250 KB/s. regards Amudhan P On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 1:19 PM David Spisla wrote: > Hello folks, > > I did some observations concerning the bitrot daemon. It seems to be that > the bitrot signer i

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Version uplift query

Hi Poornima, Instead of killing process stopping volume followed by stopping service in nodes and update glusterfs. can't we follow the above step? regards Amudhan On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 8:16 AM Poornima Gurusiddaiah wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019, 11:52 PM Ingo Fischer wrote: > >> Hi

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Request for Comments: Upgrades from 3.x to 4.0+

does RIO improves folder listing and rebalance, when compared to 3.x? if yes, do you have any performance data comparing RIO and DHT? On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Kaushal M <kshlms...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 4:00 PM, Amudhan P <amudha...@gmail.com> wrot

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Request for Comments: Upgrades from 3.x to 4.0+

if doing an upgrade from 3.10.1 to 4.0 or 4.1, will I be able to access volume without any challenge? I am asking this because 4.0 comes with DHT2? On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Kaushal M wrote: > We're fast approaching the time for Gluster-4.0. And we would like to >