[Gluster-devel] Trash test aborted netbsd regression

http://build.gluster.org/job/netbsd7-regression/634/ (I had observed same failure earlier as well but didnt have link) -- --Atin ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] GlusterFs upstream bugzilla components Fine graining

On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Muthu Vigneshwaran wrote: > Hi, > > Actually the currently component list in the Bugzilla appears to be in > just alphabetical order of all components and sub-components as a flattened > list. > > Planning to better organize the component list. So the bugs can b

Re: [Gluster-devel] Checklist for glusterd component for upstream release

We will provide the tests by early next week. On Saturday 3 September 2016, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > hi, > Did you get a chance to decide on the tests that need to be done > before doing a release for glusterd component? Could you let me know who > will be providing with the list

Re: [Gluster-devel] Avoid merge conflicts for per component eventing changes

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Atin Mukherjee > wrote: > >> Is it a good idea to consolidate all of the events declaration (the >> identified ones) in one patch and then respective patches take care of &g

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Request to provide PASS flags to a patch in gerrit

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Raghavendra Talur wrote: > Hi All, > > We have a test [1] which is causing hangs in NetBSD. We have not been able > to debug the issue yet. > It could be because the bash script does not comply with posix guidelines > or that there is a bug in the brick code. > >

Re: [Gluster-devel] Avoid merge conflicts for per component eventing changes

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > Is it a good idea to consolidate all of the events declaration (the > identified ones) in one patch and then respective patches take care of > implementing them to avoid the merge conflicts we are going through? > I'v

[Gluster-devel] Avoid merge conflicts for per component eventing changes

Is it a good idea to consolidate all of the events declaration (the identified ones) in one patch and then respective patches take care of implementing them to avoid the merge conflicts we are going through? --Atin ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-

Re: [Gluster-devel] 3.9. feature freeze status check

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 9:38 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > hi, > Now that we are almost near the feature freeze date (31st of Aug), > want to get a sense if any of the status of the features. > > Please respond with: > 1) Feature already merged > 2) Undergoing r

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gerrit Access Control

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Nigel Babu wrote: > Hello folks, > > We have not pruned our Gerrit maintainers list ever as far as I can see. > We've > only added people. For security reasons, I'd like to propose that we do the > following: > > If you do not have a commit in the last 90 days, y

Re: [Gluster-devel] mainline compilation fails

tches (the ones which failed smoke and other tests). On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 8:34 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > The patch http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15331/ is now ready for merge. > > Niels - could you merge it? > > > On Saturday 27 August 2016, Prasanna Kalever wrote: >

Re: [Gluster-devel] mainline compilation fails

n (mostly > not, that I see from the code) > > Thanks, > -- > Prasanna > > > On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 8:34 PM, Atin Mukherjee > > wrote: > > > > > > On Saturday 27 August 2016, Prasanna Kalever > wrote: > >> > >> Here is the patch that sh

Re: [Gluster-devel] NetBSD aborted runs

This is still bothering us a lot and looks like there is a genuine issue in the code which is making the the process to be hung/deadlocked? Raghavendra T - any more findings? On Friday 19 August 2016, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368421 > &g

Re: [Gluster-devel] mainline compilation fails

ntly I see that the parent patch has a -1, in that case is it required to revert 15225? > > Happy weekend! > > -- > Prasanna > > > On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 7:49 PM, Atin Mukherjee > wrote: > > [1] has broken mainline compilation and I feel this could be because

[Gluster-devel] mainline compilation fails

[1] has broken mainline compilation and I feel this could be because its parent patch is not been merged otherwise smoke should have caught it. Please resolve it at earliest. [1] http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15225/ --Atin ___ Gluster-devel mailing lis

Re: [Gluster-devel] Compilation failed on latest gluster

Hmm, do a make uninstall, ./autogen.sh, ./configure, make && make install On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Nigel Babu wrote: > Are you using something that's not Centos, NetBSD, or FreeBSD? > > I'm curious how we managed to slip a build failure despite our smoke tests. > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] CFP for Gluster Developer Summit

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 5:43 PM, Arthy Loganathan wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to propose below topic as a lightening talk. > > Title: Data Logging to monitor Gluster Performance > > Theme: Process and Infrastructure > > To benchmark any software product, we often need to do performance > analys

Re: [Gluster-devel] Events API: Adding support for Client Events

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 9:27 PM, Aravinda wrote: > Today I discussed about the topic with Rajesh, Avra and Kotresh. Summary > as below > > - Instead of exposing eventsd to external world why not expose a Glusterd > RPC for gf_event, Since Glusterd already has logic for backup volfile > server. >

Re: [Gluster-devel] NetBSD Regressions for the last 7 days

On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Nigel Babu wrote: > Note > * A bunch of regressions are not included since we switched job names > * NetBSD had a lot of aborted runs this past week. > > *16* of *89* regressions failed > > *./tests/basic/afr/add-brick-self-heal.t;* Failed *6* times > > Regression

Re: [Gluster-devel] CentOS Regressions Failures for the last week

On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Nigel Babu wrote: > Note: A few failures don't show up because we switched job names. > > > *50* of *102* regressions failed > > *./tests/basic/afr/add-brick-self-heal.t;* Failed *1* times > > Regression Link: http://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/5/ > c

Re: [Gluster-devel] Disperse volume performance improvement using clients-io-theads

On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:09 AM, jayakrishnan mm wrote: > Hi, > Glusterfs Ver: 3.7.6 > > 1) Currently I am using disperse volume and its performance is not > satisfactory. > So I tried "sudo gluster v set ec-vol performance.client-io-threads on" > (as per https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug

[Gluster-devel] NetBSD aborted runs

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368421 NetBSD regressions are getting aborted very frequently. Apart from the infra issue related to connectivity (Nigel has started looking into it), lock_revocation.t is getting hung in such instances which is causing run to be aborted after 300 minut

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] release-3.6 end of life

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 3:03 AM, Lindsay Mathieson < lindsay.mathie...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 19/08/2016 3:45 AM, Diego Remolina wrote: > >> The one thing that still remains a mystery to me is how to downgrade >> glusterfs packages in Ubuntu. I have never been able to do that. There >> was also a

Re: [Gluster-devel] FYI: change in bugzilla version(s) starting with the 3.9 release

On Wednesday 17 August 2016, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > Hi, > > In today's Gluster Community Meeting it was tentatively agreed that we > will change how we report the GlusterFS version for glusterfs bugs. > > Starting with the 3.9 release there will only be a "3.9" version in > bugzilla; compared

Re: [Gluster-devel] CFP for Gluster Developer Summit

Here is one of the proposal from my end: "Gluster maintainers responsibilities" Theme - Process & Infrastructure - Tracking incoming reviews and managing pending review backlogs with the help of peer reviews/review marathon on a weekly basis - Bug triaging & prioritization - Current form of com

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Screening 3.6 buglist one last time: After Bug-triage meeting 16/Aug/2016

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Kaushal M wrote: > Hi all, > > As you know, 3.6 will be EOLed once 3.9 is released. But we still have > a lot of bugs open on 3.6.x [1]. We need to screen these bugs and > close/clone these as required. > > In yesterday's community meeting, we decided to have thi

Re: [Gluster-devel] mount_dir value seems clobbered in all /var/lib/glusterd/vols//bricks/: files

glusterd_get_brick_mount_dir () does a brick_dir++ which seems to cause this problem and removing this line fixes the problem. Commit f846e54b introduced it. Ccing Avra/Rajesh mount_dir is used by snapshot, however I am just wondering how are we surviving this case. ~Atin On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 a

Re: [Gluster-devel] regression burn-in summary over the last 7 days

On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 8:19 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > >> [Thanks to Jeff Darcy, Poornima G and Raghavendra Talur for >> extras/failed-tests.py which generates this summary] >> >> Found cores: >>

Re: [Gluster-devel] regression burn-in summary over the last 7 days

I think we should compare n-1th week report with nth and any common tests out of that comparison having more than or equal to 3 instances of failures SHOULD immediately marked as bad and any component having more than 5 bad tests should be BLOCKED for further merges till bad tests are fixed. What d

Re: [Gluster-devel] Events API: Adding support for Client Events

On Wednesday 3 August 2016, Vijay Bellur wrote: > On 08/02/2016 11:24 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 8:21 PM, Vijay Bellur > > wrote: >> >> On 08/02/2016 07:27 AM, Aravinda wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> As many of you a

Re: [Gluster-devel] regression burn-in summary over the last 7 days

On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > [Thanks to Jeff Darcy, Poornima G and Raghavendra Talur for > extras/failed-tests.py which generates this summary] > > Found cores: > > Component: [u'glusterfs-1879.core'] > Regression Link: > https://build.gluster.org/job/regression-t

[Gluster-devel] tests/features/lock_revocation.t is timing out in NetBSD slaves

Few instances: https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-netbsd7-regression-triggered/18453/console https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-netbsd7-regression-triggered/18452/ --Atin ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.glus

Re: [Gluster-devel] I missed a patch in earlier releases of 3.7.x which is breaking virt usecase

On Saturday 30 July 2016, Krutika Dhananjay wrote: > http://review.gluster.org/15041 is ready to be merged. > Request someone with merge access to please merge it. > > Done > -Krutika > > On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 7:36 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < > pkara...@redhat.com > > wrote: > >> When are y

Re: [Gluster-devel] Duplicati UUID entries

On Friday 29 July 2016, ABHISHEK PALIWAL wrote: > Hi, > > After a long time I am posting one more issue here. > > We have two board and glusterfs in sync on both of them, and our test case > to restart one board continuously but in this TestCase we are getting > duplicate entries of UUID in "glus

Re: [Gluster-devel] regression failed : snapshot/bug-1316437.t

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 12:34 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 04:34:17PM +0530, Avra Sengupta wrote: > > The crux of the problem is that as of today, brick processes on restart > try > > to reuse the old port they were using (assuming that no other process > will > > be using it

Re: [Gluster-devel] regression failed : snapshot/bug-1316437.t

On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 7:12 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Atin Mukherjee > wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Avra Sengupta >> wrote: >> >>> The crux of the problem is that as of today, br

Re: [Gluster-devel] regression failed : snapshot/bug-1316437.t

On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Avra Sengupta > wrote: > >> The crux of the problem is that as of today, brick processes on restart >> try to reuse the old port they were using (assuming that no other proce

Re: [Gluster-devel] regression failed : snapshot/bug-1316437.t

On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote: > The crux of the problem is that as of today, brick processes on restart > try to reuse the old port they were using (assuming that no other process > will be using it, and not consulting pmap_registry_alloc() before using > it). With a recen

Re: [Gluster-devel] 3.7 regressions on NetBSD

On Saturday 23 July 2016, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > If someone could give +1 on 3.7 backport > http://review.gluster.org/#/c/14991, I can merge the patch. Then we can > start rebasing may be? > Merged! > > On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Atin Mukherjee >

Re: [Gluster-devel] 3.7 regressions on NetBSD

AFAIK, an explicit rebase is required. On Saturday 23 July 2016, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > > > On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Nithya Balachandran > wrote: > >> >> >> On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Nithya Balachandran > > wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 9:07 PM, Pranith

Re: [Gluster-devel] 3.7 regressions on NetBSD

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Nigel Babu wrote: > Hello, > > I attempted to get us more space on NetBSD by creating a new partition > called > /data and putting /build as a symlink to /data/build. This has caused > problems > with tests/basic/quota.t. It's marked as bad for master, but not for

Re: [Gluster-devel] Fwd: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for gluster/glusterfs

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to > gluster/glusterfs found with Coverity Scan. > > 22 new defect(s) introduced to gluster/glusterfs found with Coverity Scan. > 2

[Gluster-devel] Fwd: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for gluster/glusterfs

Hi, Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to gluster/glusterfs found with Coverity Scan. 22 new defect(s) introduced to gluster/glusterfs found with Coverity Scan. 27 defect(s), reported by Coverity Scan earlier, were marked fixed in the recent build analyzed by Coverity Scan.

Re: [Gluster-devel] Regression failures in last 3 days

On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Poornima Gurusiddaiah wrote: > Hi, > > Below are the list of test cases that have failed regression in the last 3 > days. Please take a look at them: > > *./tests/bitrot/br-stub.t* ; Failed *8* times > Regression Links: > https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspa

Re: [Gluster-devel] Question on merging zfs snapshot support into the mainline glusterfs

ll implement the interface. The code >> doesn't have to assume anything about underlying socket type. Do you guys >> think it is a worthwhile effort to separate out the logic of interface and >> the code which uses snapshots? I see quite a few of if (strcmp ("zfs", >&

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Gluster Events API - Help required to identify the list of Events from each component

So the framework is in now mainline branch [1]. I'd request all of you to start thinking about all the important events required to be captured as a next step and feedback. [1] http://review.gluster.org/14248 ~Atin On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Aravinda wrote: > +gluster-users > > regards >

Re: [Gluster-devel] Setting up NFS ganesha using gdeploy

Great going, Sac! On Wednesday 13 July 2016, Sachidananda URS wrote: > Hi, > > I've fixed nfs-ganesha module in gdeploy and merged in master. > Now we will be able to setup NFS-Ganesha on a freshly installed RHEL 7 > machines end-to-end > (Including subscribing to channels and installing the nec

Re: [Gluster-devel] tests/basic/op_errnos.t failure

https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/22156/consoleFull - another failure On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Avra Sengupta > wrote: > >> Hi Atin, >> >> Please check the t

Re: [Gluster-devel] tests/basic/op_errnos.t failure

0:42* mount: > special device /dev/patchy_snap_vg_1/brick_lvm does not exist*02:50:53* > ./tests/basic/op_errnos.t .. *02:50:53* 1..21*02:50:53* ok 1, > LINENUM:12*02:50:53* ok 2, LINENUM:13*02:50:53* ok 3, LINENUM:14*02:50:53* ok > 4, LINENUM:16*02:50:53* ok 5, LINENUM:18*02:50:

[Gluster-devel] tests/basic/op_errnos.t failure

Hi Avra, The above fails locally as well along with few regression failures I observed and one of them are at [1] not ok 12 Got " 30807" instead of "30809", LINENUM:26 FAILED COMMAND: 30809 get-op_errno-xml snapshot restore snap1 not ok 17 Got " 30815" instead of "30812", LINENUM:31 FAILED COM

[Gluster-devel] tests/bugs/glusterd/bug-963541.t constantly failing on local setup

While looking at the regression failure of [1] I ran the test mentioned in $Subj in my local set up and I could see it failed 5 out of 5 times. The tests at line number 24 & 25 try to start and stop the rebalance, but the later fails because by that time rebalance process still hasn't come up beca

Re: [Gluster-devel] How to solve the FSYNC() ERR

> > 发自 网易邮箱大师 <http://u.163.com/signature> > On 07/09/2016 17:58, Atin Mukherjee > wrote: > > Any specific reason of using 3.3 given that its really quite old? We are > at 3.6, 3.7 & 3.8 supportability matrix now. > > > On Saturday 9 July 2016, Keiviw

Re: [Gluster-devel] How to solve the FSYNC() ERR

Any specific reason of using 3.3 given that its really quite old? We are at 3.6, 3.7 & 3.8 supportability matrix now. On Saturday 9 July 2016, Keiviw wrote: > hi, > I have installed GlusterFS 3.3.0, and now I get Fsync failures when > saving files with the O_DIRECT flag in open() and create

Re: [Gluster-devel] Reducing merge conflicts

How about having "review marathon" once a week by every team? In past this has worked well and I don't see any reason why can't we spend 3-4 hours in a meeting on weekly basis to review incoming patches on the component that the team owns. On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Poornima Gurusiddaiah wr

Re: [Gluster-devel] iSCSI

Prasanna - Can you help here? ~Atin On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 3:51 AM, francis Lavalliere < francis.lavalli...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I've been messing around with Gluster FS version 3.7 and 3.8. > > Currently i am trying to implement iSCSI with Gluster FS. > > I've installed ubuntu 16.04 a

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Glusterfs-3.7.13 release plans

Can you take in http://review.gluster.org/#/c/14861 ? On Thursday 7 July 2016, Kaushal M wrote: > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Kaushal M > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I'm (or was) planning to do a 3.7.13 release on schedule today. 3.7.12 > > has a huge issue with libgfapi, solved by [1]. >

[Gluster-devel] glusterd log file is renamed now

This is a heads up to all devs that we have now renamed the glusterd log file from $INSTALL_PREFIX-etc-glusterfs-glusterd.vol.log to glusterd.log in mainline [1] to avoid confusions for many gluster users. I've seen users reverting to emails asking for which log file to look at when asked for glust

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] 3.7.12/3.8.qemu/proxmox testing

On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Poornima Gurusiddaiah wrote: > > - Original Message - > > From: "Lindsay Mathieson" > > To: "Kaushal M" , gluster-us...@gluster.org > > Cc: "Gluster Devel" > > Sent: Monday, July 4, 2016 4:23:37 PM > > Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] 3.7.12/3.8.qemu/proxmox

Re: [Gluster-devel] About Gluster cluster availability when one of out of two nodes is down

A gentle reminder for your feedback, if I don't see any objections on this, the default behaviour is going to change here where daemon processes will be started at the time of glusterd init and irrespective of peer count. On Thursday 30 June 2016, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > Currently on a

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Glusterfs-3.7.13 release plans

On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Kaushal M wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'm (or was) planning to do a 3.7.13 release on schedule today. 3.7.12 >> has a huge issue with libgfapi, solved by [1]

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] About Gluster cluster availability when one of out of two nodes is down

On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Ravishankar N wrote: > On 06/30/2016 11:40 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > Currently on a two node set up, if node B goes down and node A is rebooted > brick process(es) on node A doesn't come up to avoid split brains. > > > This has alw

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Glusterfs-3.7.13 release plans

On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Kaushal M wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm (or was) planning to do a 3.7.13 release on schedule today. 3.7.12 > has a huge issue with libgfapi, solved by [1]. > I'm not sure if this fixes the other issues with libgfapi noticed by > Lindsay on gluster-users. > > This patc

[Gluster-devel] About Gluster cluster availability when one of out of two nodes is down

Currently on a two node set up, if node B goes down and node A is rebooted brick process(es) on node A doesn't come up to avoid split brains. However we have had concerns/bugs from different gluster users on the availability with this configuration. So we can solve this issue by starting the brick

Re: [Gluster-devel] Support for Scaling TIered volume, ie Add/Remove brick and Rebalance

I've added my comments in the document. I also feel that getting an user's experience on the command semantics is much required, so mind to open this up in gluster-users ML too? On 06/21/2016 11:31 AM, Mohammed Rafi K C wrote: > Hi, > > The current implementation of Tiering lacks support for reba

Re: [Gluster-devel] Support for Scaling Tier volume, ie Add/Remove brick and Rebalance

On 06/21/2016 12:05 PM, Hari Gowtham wrote: > > > - Original Message - >> From: "Mohammed Rafi K C" >> To: "Atin Mukherjee" , "Gluster Devel" >> >> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 11:51:13 AM >> Subject: Re: [Gluste

Re: [Gluster-devel] Support for Scaling TIered volume, ie Add/Remove brick and Rebalance

The current doc is read-only. Could you please open up the permissions to add comments? ~Atin On 06/21/2016 11:31 AM, Mohammed Rafi K C wrote: > Hi, > > The current implementation of Tiering lacks support for rebalance, as > the migration daemon uses the framework for rebalance process. Because

Re: [Gluster-devel] Question on merging zfs snapshot support into the mainline glusterfs

On 06/21/2016 11:41 AM, Rajesh Joseph wrote: > What kind of locking issues you see? If you can provide some more > information I can be able to help you. That's related to stale lock issues on GlusterD which are there in 3.6.1 since the fixes landed in the branch post 3.6.1. I have already provi

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release Management Process change - proposal

-Atin Sent from one plus one On 10-Jun-2016 6:09 PM, "Atin Mukherjee" wrote: > > > > On 06/06/2016 10:00 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > >

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release Management Process change - proposal

On 06/06/2016 10:00 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 10:55:58PM -0400, Vijay Bellur wrote: On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 9:37 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > Since we

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Random voting in Gerrit - Check votes before merging

On 06/09/2016 06:23 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > On 06/09/2016 05:11 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: >> >> >> On 06/09/2016 02:38 PM, Kaushal M wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Kaushal M wrote: >>>> A heads up to all maintainers and developers. >

Re: [Gluster-devel] Random voting in Gerrit - Check votes before merging

On 06/09/2016 02:38 PM, Kaushal M wrote: > On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Kaushal M wrote: >> A heads up to all maintainers and developers. >> >> As all of you probably already know, reviews in Gerrit are getting >> random votes for jobs that ran for other patchsets. >> >> We've had people not

Re: [Gluster-devel] IMPORTANT: Patches that need attention for 3.8

On 06/08/2016 06:34 PM, Poornima Gurusiddaiah wrote: > Hi, > > Here is the list of patches that need to go for 3.8. I request the > maintainers of each component mentioned here to review/merge the same at > the earliest: > > Protocol/RPC: > http://review.gluster.org/#/c/14647/ > http://review.g

Re: [Gluster-devel] gluster source installation

On 06/07/2016 03:17 PM, jayakrishnan mm wrote: > Hi, > > Host system : Ububtu 14.04 > Gluster ver : 3.7.11 > I did ./autogen.sh > ./configure --enable-debug > make > make install > > After that when I try to manually start the gluster daemon, It give > below error. > > jk@jk:/usr/local/l

Re: [Gluster-devel] Some error appear when create glusterfs volume

TH, Atin On 06/06/2016 02:51 PM, Jiang, Jet (Nokia - CN/Hangzhou) wrote: > Hi, > > Ok, thank you very much~~ > > Thanks, > Br, > Jet > > -Original Message- > From: Atin Mukherjee [mailto:amukh...@redhat.com] > Sent: Monday, June 06, 2016 5:07 PM >

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gerrit (review.gluster.org/git.gluster.org) downtime in 15 mins

On 06/01/2016 08:40 AM, Nigel Babu wrote: > Hello folks, > > The upgrade is now complete! Please let me know if you notice anything > wrong. It does appear slow to me compared to previous version. > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 7:45 AM, Nigel Babu > wrote: > > Hell

Re: [Gluster-devel] netbsd smoke tests fail when code patches are backported to release-3.6

No, we didn't solve this problem yet. Niels had a patch up for review to fix it but unfortunately it didn't. Kaushal also tried to reproduce it on a netbsd machine, but nothing failed for him. -Atin Sent from one plus one On 20-May-2016 9:25 PM, "Emmanuel Dreyfus" wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2016 a

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Idea: Alternate Release process

A bit late but better than never. My vote is for option 2. ~Atin On 05/18/2016 07:19 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > [Adding gluster-users] > > I would like to wrap this poll by the next community meeting on 25th > May. Can you please weigh in with your opinions on the options > provided by Aravinda?

Re: [Gluster-devel] [release-3.7] smoke build failed

On 05/13/2016 11:39 AM, Milind Changire wrote: > Job: https://build.gluster.org/job/smoke/27731/console > Error: bin/mkdir: cannot create directory > `/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/gluster': Permission denied > > Please advise. > Do I just resubmit the job? > Would restarting the VM be of he

[Gluster-devel] Show and Tell sessions for Gluster 4.0

In the view of keeping the visibility of the work completed vs work in progress and getting some fruitful feedback from the community we are thinking of having a hangout/bluejeans session for 30-45 minutes once in every month. The sessions will be concentrating on discussing the work done over the

Re: [Gluster-devel] git-branch-diff: wrapper script for git to visualize backports

On 05/05/2016 11:25 PM, Prasanna Kalever wrote: > Hi Team, > > Checkout glusterfs script that is capable of showing your list of commits > missed (backporting) in other branches (say 3.7.12) w.r.t master > > http://review.gluster.org/#/c/14230/ > > > This script helps in visualizing backporte

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster Brick Offline after reboot!!

ay 4, 2016 at 5:53 PM, Atin Mukherjee <mailto:amukh...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > Abhishek, > > See the response inline. > > > On 05/04/2016 05:43 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL wrote: > > Hi Atin, > > > > please reply, is there any co

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster Brick Offline after reboot!!

Setting > brick 10.32.1.144:/opt/lvmdir/c2/brick status to stopped > > > Regards, > Abhishek > > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Atin Mukherjee > mailto:amukh...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > > &

Re: [Gluster-devel] State of 3.7 regression

Strange, there is no delta in tests/bugs/glusterd/bug-1314649-group-virt.t between master and 3.7 and I ran it locally and it passed. Gaurav, Mind to grep through the logs and find out the cause of the failure? Thanks, Atin On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Raghavendra Talur wrote: > Hi All, >

Re: [Gluster-devel] Worm translator not truly disabled by default?

On 05/03/2016 05:10 PM, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > > > - Original Message - >> From: "Krutika Dhananjay" >> To: "Joseph Fernandes" , "Karthik Subrahmanya" >> >> Cc: "Gluster Devel" >> Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2016 2:53:02 PM >> Subject: Worm translator not truly disabled by default?

[Gluster-devel] r.g.o seems to be inaccessible

___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] ./tests/basic/tier/new-tier-cmds.t failing on master branch

On 04/30/2016 02:47 PM, Susant Palai wrote: > Hi, > ./tests/basic/tier/new-tier-cmds.t failed on > https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/20191/console. > > I ran it on master branch on my local setup and it fails continuously. It doesn't in my local setup :-/ > >

Re: [Gluster-devel] ./tests/basic/afr/arbiter-mount.t failing

On 04/30/2016 03:51 PM, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > Hi, > > I am running the CentOS regression for the WORM/Retention feature. > The ./tests/basic/afr/arbiter-mount.t [1] test is failing again and again > even if > the WORM/Retention feature is not enabled. Is it that 20 seconds timeout (NFS_E

Re: [Gluster-devel] Regression-test-burn-in crash in EC test

-Atin Sent from one plus one On 29-Apr-2016 9:36 PM, "Ashish Pandey" wrote: > > > Hi Jeff, > > Where can we find the core dump? > > --- > Ashish > > > From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" > To: "Jeff Darcy" > Cc: "Gluster Devel" , "Ashish Pandey" < aspan...@redhat.com

Re: [Gluster-devel] Core generated by trash.t

-20 at 01:21 +0530, Atin Mukherjee wrote: >>> >>> Regression run [1] failed from trash.t, however the same doesn't >>> talk >>> about any core file, but when I run it with and with out my changes >>> the same generates a core. >> on w

[Gluster-devel] Core generated by trash.t

Regression run [1] failed from trash.t, however the same doesn't talk about any core file, but when I run it with and with out my changes the same generates a core. [1] https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-netbsd7-regression-triggered/15971/consoleFull ~Atin ___

Re: [Gluster-devel] smoke test fails for netbsd6

On 04/18/2016 09:03 PM, Michael Scherer wrote: > Le lundi 18 avril 2016 à 21:00 +0530, Atin Mukherjee a écrit : >> >> On 04/18/2016 08:32 PM, Michael Scherer wrote: >>> Le lundi 18 avril 2016 à 19:15 +0530, Atin Mukherjee a écrit : >>>> >>>>

Re: [Gluster-devel] smoke test fails for netbsd6

On 04/18/2016 08:32 PM, Michael Scherer wrote: > Le lundi 18 avril 2016 à 19:15 +0530, Atin Mukherjee a écrit : >> >> On 04/16/2016 10:00 PM, Polakis Vaggelis wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> tried to backport fix for BUG 1269470 >&

Re: [Gluster-devel] smoke test fails for netbsd6

On 04/16/2016 10:00 PM, Polakis Vaggelis wrote: > Hi, > > tried to backport fix for BUG 1269470 > https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/commit/ebe40c5047e7501a5bd1747cb4d62277ae0db6e9 > > to 3.6 branch. > > review link: > http://review.gluster.org/#/c/14007/ > > but smoke test failed > --- glu

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] More news on 3.7.11

On 04/15/2016 01:32 PM, Kaushal M wrote: > Some more (bad) news on the status of 3.7.11. > > I've been doing some more tests with release-3.7, and found that the > fix for solving daemons failing to start when management encryption is > enabled doesn't work in all cases. > > Now I've got 2 opti

Re: [Gluster-devel] Brick port allocation by GlusterD

er.org/#/c/10785 On 03/31/2016 07:24 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > As of now GlusterD maintains its own portmap table and is responsible > for allocating ports for the services like brick process, snapd. The > flow with the portmap goes like this: > > When a volume start is triggered, Gl

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster Brick Offline after reboot!!

On 04/14/2016 04:07 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Atin Mukherjee <mailto:amukh...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > > > On 04/05/2016 03:35 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 5

Re: [Gluster-devel] Which test generates the core?

On 04/14/2016 04:38 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Atin Mukherjee < amukh...@redhat.com > >> wrote: > >>> I am pretty sure that earlier we used to log the culprit test generating >> >>> the core. But now I don&

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster Brick Offline after reboot!!

On 04/05/2016 03:35 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Atin Mukherjee <mailto:amukh...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > > > On 04/05/2016 01:04 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL wrote: > > Hi Team, > > > > We are usi

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster Brick Offline after reboot!!

//10.32.0.48>: > Temporary failure in name resolution > Apr 7 23:56:36 2016 oamhost daemon.info <http://daemon.info> > rsyncd[10875]: name lookup failed for 10.32.0.48 <http://10.32.0.48>: > Temporary failure in name resolution > Apr 7 23:56:36 2016 oamhost daemon.in

[Gluster-devel] Which test generates the core?

I am pretty sure that earlier we used to log the culprit test generating the core. But now I don't see that same behavior in these runs [1] [2] [1] https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/19709/consoleFull [2] https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggere

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Update on GlusterFS-3.7.10

On 04/13/2016 08:40 AM, Lindsay Mathieson wrote: > On 7 April 2016 at 15:42, Kaushal M wrote: >> This regression was decided as a blocker, and a decision was made to >> do a quick GlusterFS-3.7.11 release solving it. The 3.7.11 release >> should be available in within the next 2 days. > > > Is

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >