Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] GlusterFS - 6.0RC - Test days (27th, 28th Feb)

On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 10:20 AM Atin Mukherjee wrote: > I am not sure how BZ 1683815 > can be a blocker at > RC. We have a fix ready, but to me it doesn't look like a blocker. Vijay - > any objections? > None from me as it is an existing mino

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] GlusterFS - 6.0RC - Test days (27th, 28th Feb)

I am not sure how BZ 1683815 can be a blocker at RC. We have a fix ready, but to me it doesn't look like a blocker. Vijay - any objections? Also the bugzilla dependency of all bugs attached to the release-6 is sort of messed up. I see most of t

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] GlusterFS - 6.0RC - Test days (27th, 28th Feb)

On 3/4/19 12:33 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > On 3/4/19 10:08 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 at 20:33, Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan >> mailto:atumb...@redhat.com>> wrote: >> >> Thanks to those who participated. >> >> Update at present: >> >> We found 3 blocker bugs

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] GlusterFS - 6.0RC - Test days (27th, 28th Feb)

On 3/4/19 10:08 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 at 20:33, Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan > mailto:atumb...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > Thanks to those who participated. > > Update at present: > > We found 3 blocker bugs in upgrade scenarios, and hence have marked > r

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] GlusterFS - 6.0RC - Test days (27th, 28th Feb)

On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 at 20:33, Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan wrote: > Thanks to those who participated. > > Update at present: > > We found 3 blocker bugs in upgrade scenarios, and hence have marked release > as pending upon them. We will keep these lists updated about progress. I’d like to clarify