Le mardi 22 octobre 2019 à 13:17 +0530, Amar Tumballi a écrit :
> Thanks for the email Misc. My reasons inline.
>
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 4:44 PM Michael Scherer
> wrote:
>
> > Le lundi 14 octobre 2019 à 20:30 +0530, Amar Tumballi a écrit :
> > > On Mon, 14 Oct, 2019, 5:37 PM Niels de Vos,
>
Le lundi 14 octobre 2019 à 20:30 +0530, Amar Tumballi a écrit :
> On Mon, 14 Oct, 2019, 5:37 PM Niels de Vos,
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 03:52:30PM +0530, Amar Tumballi wrote:
> > > Any thoughts on this?
> > >
> > > I tried a basic .travis.yml for the unified glusterfs repo I am
> >
Centos CI was voting Glusterd2 repo's pull requests.
https://github.com/gluster/centosci/blob/master/jobs/glusterd2.yml
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 8:31 PM Amar Tumballi wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 14 Oct, 2019, 5:37 PM Niels de Vos, wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 03:52:30PM +0530, Amar Tumballi
On Mon, 14 Oct 2019, 17:01 Amar Tumballi wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 14 Oct, 2019, 5:37 PM Niels de Vos, wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 03:52:30PM +0530, Amar Tumballi wrote:
>> > Any thoughts on this?
>> >
>> > I tried a basic .travis.yml for the unified glusterfs repo I am
>> > maintaining, and
On Mon, 14 Oct, 2019, 5:37 PM Niels de Vos, wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 03:52:30PM +0530, Amar Tumballi wrote:
> > Any thoughts on this?
> >
> > I tried a basic .travis.yml for the unified glusterfs repo I am
> > maintaining, and it is good enough for getting most of the tests.
> >
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 03:52:30PM +0530, Amar Tumballi wrote:
> Any thoughts on this?
>
> I tried a basic .travis.yml for the unified glusterfs repo I am
> maintaining, and it is good enough for getting most of the tests.
> Considering we are very close to glusterfs-7.0 release, it is good to
Any thoughts on this?
I tried a basic .travis.yml for the unified glusterfs repo I am
maintaining, and it is good enough for getting most of the tests.
Considering we are very close to glusterfs-7.0 release, it is good to time
this after 7.0 release.
-Amar
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 5:13 PM Amar
Going through the thread, I see in general positive responses for the same,
with few points on review system, and not loosing information when merging
the patches.
While we are working on that, we need to see and understand how our CI/CD
looks like with github migration. We surely need suggestion
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 06:57:14AM +0530, Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 12:10 AM Niels de Vos wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 08:36:30PM +0530, Aravinda Vishwanathapura Krishna
> > Murthy wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 7:49 PM Joe Julian wrote:
> > >
> >
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 12:10 AM Niels de Vos wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 08:36:30PM +0530, Aravinda Vishwanathapura Krishna
> Murthy wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 7:49 PM Joe Julian wrote:
> >
> > > > Comparing the changes between revisions is something
> > > that GitHub does not
+1 to the idea.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 2:41 PM Niels de Vos wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 08:08:36AM -0700, Joe Julian wrote:
> > You can also see diffs between force pushes now.
>
> That is great! It is the feature that I was looking for. I have not
> noticed it yet, will pay attention to
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 08:36:30PM +0530, Aravinda Vishwanathapura Krishna
Murthy wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 7:49 PM Joe Julian wrote:
>
> > > Comparing the changes between revisions is something
> > that GitHub does not support...
> >
> > It does support that,
> >
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 8:44 PM Joe Julian wrote:
> You can also see diffs between force pushes now.
>
Nice.
> On August 26, 2019 8:06:30 AM PDT, Aravinda Vishwanathapura Krishna Murthy
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 7:49 PM Joe Julian wrote:
>>
>>> > Comparing the changes
You can also see diffs between force pushes now.
On August 26, 2019 8:06:30 AM PDT, Aravinda Vishwanathapura Krishna Murthy
wrote:
>On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 7:49 PM Joe Julian
>wrote:
>
>> > Comparing the changes between revisions is something
>> that GitHub does not support...
>>
>> It does
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 7:49 PM Joe Julian wrote:
> > Comparing the changes between revisions is something
> that GitHub does not support...
>
> It does support that,
> actually.___
>
Yes, it does support. We need to use Squash merge after all review
> Comparing the changes between revisions is something
that GitHub does not support...
It does support that, actually.___
Community Meeting Calendar:
APAC Schedule -
Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 11:30 AM IST
Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/836554017
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 11:56:53PM -0400, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Aug 2019, 9:13 Amar Tumballi wrote:
>
> > Hi developers,
> >
> > With this email, I want to understand what is the general feeling around
> > this topic.
> >
> > We from gluster org (in github.com/gluster) have many
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 6:12 AM Amar Tumballi wrote:
> Hi developers,
>
> With this email, I want to understand what is the general feeling around
> this topic.
>
> We from gluster org (in github.com/gluster) have many projects which
> follow complete github workflow, where as there are few,
On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 4:33 PM Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay <
sankarshan.mukhopadh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 6:42 PM Amar Tumballi wrote:
> >
> > Hi developers,
> >
> > With this email, I want to understand what is the general feeling around
> this topic.
> >
> > We from gluster
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019, 9:12 AM Amar Tumballi wrote:
> Hi developers,
>
> With this email, I want to understand what is the general feeling around
> this topic.
>
> We from gluster org (in github.com/gluster) have many projects which
> follow complete github workflow, where as there are few,
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 6:42 PM Amar Tumballi wrote:
>
> Hi developers,
>
> With this email, I want to understand what is the general feeling around this
> topic.
>
> We from gluster org (in github.com/gluster) have many projects which follow
> complete github workflow, where as there are few,
21 matches
Mail list logo
