I tried this configuration on my local setup and the test passed fine.
Adding the fuse and write-behind maintainers in Gluster to check if they
are aware of any oddities with using mmap & fuse.
Thanks,
Vijay
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 2:21 PM Jim Kinney wrote:
> Volume Name: home
> Type: Replicat
Thank you for the reproducer! Can you please let us know the output of
`gluster volume info`?
Regards,
Vijay
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 12:53 PM Jim Kinney wrote:
> This python will fail when writing to a file in a glusterfs fuse mounted
> directory.
>
> import mmap
>
> # write a simple example fi
Hi Jim,
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 6:21 PM Jim Kinney wrote:
>
> Issues with glusterfs fuse mounts cause issues with python file open for
> write. We have to use nfs to avoid this.
>
> Really want to see better back-end tools to facilitate cleaning up of
> glusterfs failures. If system is going to
Hi Hans,
Thanks for the honest feedback. Appreciate this.
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 5:39 PM Hans Henrik Happe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Looking into something else I fell over this proposal. Being a shop that
> are going into "Leaving GlusterFS" mode, I thought I would give my two
> cents.
>
> While being
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 8:21 PM, Gudrun Mareike Amedick <
g.amed...@uni-luebeck.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we're planning a dispersed volume with at least 50 project directories.
> Each of those has its own quota ranging between 0.1TB and 200TB. Comparing
> XFS
> project quotas over several servers and
Hi,
we're planning a dispersed volume with at least 50 project directories. Each of
those has its own quota ranging between 0.1TB and 200TB. Comparing XFS
project quotas over several servers and bricks to make sure their total matches
the desired value doesn't really sound practical. It would pr
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 6:46 PM, mabi wrote:
> Hi Amar,
>
> Just wanted to say that I think the quota feature in GlusterFS is really
> useful. In my case I use it on one volume where I have many cloud
> installations (mostly files) for different people and all these need to
> have a different quo
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 6:06 PM, Jim Kinney wrote:
> Too bad the RDMA will be abandoned. It's the perfect transport for
> intranode processing and data sync.
>
>
> I currently use RDMA on a computational cluster between nodes and gluster
> storage. The older IB cards will support 10G IP and 40G
