> The disabling and possible removing of features would only be done in
> the release-3.8 branch. There is no intention to remove the features
> that are not finished/stable from the master branch.
>
> I also prefer to see changes merged early on, and encourage all of the
> contributors to post
> For most of the Gluster 4.0 features, I do not expect to see them as
> part of glusterfs-3.8, not even as experimental. For being in the
> experimental category, a feature needs to have a pretty complete
> implementation, documentation and tests.
I'm OK with that being true in a release branch,
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 01:39:12PM +0530, Venky Shankar wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 12:04:46PM +0530, Jiffin Tony Thottan wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I had created pull request in roadmap for DHT2 [1] with minimal details and
> > it got merged
> >
> > @Venky/Shyam : can u please do a follow
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 08:44:06PM +0530, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
> -Atin
> Sent from one plus one
> On 14-Mar-2016 6:45 pm, "Niels de Vos" wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 05:54:00PM +0530, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 03/14/2016 02:49 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 05:54:00PM +0530, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
>
>
> On 03/14/2016 02:49 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We're kicking the 3.8 release back into shape and schedule. Our planned
> > 6 month release cycle has completely failed on us, we're about 6 months
> > behind. I've
Hi,
We're kicking the 3.8 release back into shape and schedule. Our planned
6 month release cycle has completely failed on us, we're about 6 months
behind. I've taken the liberty to set aggressive deadlines and put this
on the roadmap on https://www.gluster.org/community/roadmap/3.8/ .
The page