Re: [Gluster-devel] 2 way with Arbiter degraded behavior

2018-02-21 Thread Jeff Applewhite
Yes thanks. That is exactly the scenario I was referring to. Writes will never be optimizable in this way but in random workloads the majority of IO's will usually be reads. On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:39 AM, Manoj Pillai wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 9:13 PM, Jeff Applewhite > wrote: >> >

Re: [Gluster-devel] 2 way with Arbiter degraded behavior

2018-02-21 Thread Manoj Pillai
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 9:13 PM, Jeff Applewhite wrote: > Hi All > > When you have a setup with 2 way replication + Arbiter backed by two > large RAID 6 volumes what happens when there is a disk failure and > rebuild in progress in one of those RAID sets from a client > perspective? > > Does the

[Gluster-devel] 2 way with Arbiter degraded behavior

2018-02-21 Thread Jeff Applewhite
Hi All When you have a setup with 2 way replication + Arbiter backed by two large RAID 6 volumes what happens when there is a disk failure and rebuild in progress in one of those RAID sets from a client perspective? Does the FUSE client know how to prioritize the quicker disk (the RAID set that i