>> seems like automake wants to fix this in their own codebase.
>
> Feel free to do that. In the meantime, what's the best approach
> for us to fix this warning? Can we just ignore it? (no idea
> personally)
>
Yes ignore it, it cannot be fixed properly. There are gazillion
packages which have th
- Original Message -
> subdir-objects is a terrible option,
Ok, why? :)
> seems like automake wants to fix this in their own codebase.
Feel free to do that. In the meantime, what's the best approach
for us to fix this warning? Can we just ignore it? (no idea
personally)
*
> * Seems like it needs this added to Makefile.am, to stop warnings about
> subdirectory objects:
>
> AUTOMAKE_OPTIONS = subdir-objects
>
> Pull request created for that here:
>
> https://github.com/lpabon/cmockery2/pull/11
>
subdir-objects is a terrible option, seems like au
- Original Message -
> That remind me I did not commit NetBSD's package for cmockery. I just
> did it.
While we're at it, I'll make a cmockery2 formula for OSX Homebrew. That'll
lead into a Gluster formula for it later on when things are ready. :)
Two thoughts:
* Seems like it needs t
On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 01:26:52PM +0200, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> Niels de Vos wrote:
>
> > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192420
> > Nice! Is there a plan to propose glusterfs as a FreeBSD port too?
>
> That remind me I did not commit NetBSD's package for cmockery. I just
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> Harshavardhana wrote:
>
>> Thanks to Manu we are able to get some regression tests running.
>
> NetBSD now completes basic/afr. Do you have other successes?
>
>
Yes 'meta.t' and bunch of other things work properly. There are many
bugs tha
Harshavardhana wrote:
> Thanks to Manu we are able to get some regression tests running.
NetBSD now completes basic/afr. Do you have other successes?
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
m...@netbsd.org
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluste
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 06:57:46PM -0700, Harshavardhana wrote:
>> FYI
>>
>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192420
>
> Nice! Is there a plan to propose glusterfs as a FreeBSD port too?
>
Yes, that is currently being handled
- Original Message -
> FYI
>
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192420
Cool. :)
+ Justin
--
GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org
An open source, distributed file system scaling to several
petabytes, and handling thousands of clients.
My personal twitter: twitter.com/re
Niels de Vos wrote:
> > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192420
> Nice! Is there a plan to propose glusterfs as a FreeBSD port too?
That remind me I did not commit NetBSD's package for cmockery. I just
did it.
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
m...@netbsd.org
On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 06:57:46PM -0700, Harshavardhana wrote:
> FYI
>
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192420
Nice! Is there a plan to propose glusterfs as a FreeBSD port too?
Thanks,
Niels
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-de
FYI
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192420
Thanks
--
Religious confuse piety with mere ritual, the virtuous confuse
regulation with outcomes
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailm
12 matches
Mail list logo
