On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 8:00 AM, Raghavendra Gowdappa
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 7:21 AM, Poornima Gurusiddaiah <
> pguru...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 13, 2018, 5:22 AM Vijay Bellur wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 7:44 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa <
>>> rgowd.
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 7:21 AM, Poornima Gurusiddaiah
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2018, 5:22 AM Vijay Bellur wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 7:44 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa <
>> rgowd...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> This is an option in open-behind, which lets fuse native mou
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018, 5:22 AM Vijay Bellur wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 7:44 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa > wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> This is an option in open-behind, which lets fuse native mounts to use
>> anonymous fds. The reasoning being since anonymous fds are stateless,
>> overhead of op
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 7:44 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa
wrote:
> All,
>
> This is an option in open-behind, which lets fuse native mounts to use
> anonymous fds. The reasoning being since anonymous fds are stateless,
> overhead of open is avoided and hence better performance. However, bugs
> filed
All,
This is an option in open-behind, which lets fuse native mounts to use
anonymous fds. The reasoning being since anonymous fds are stateless,
overhead of open is avoided and hence better performance. However, bugs
filed [1][2] seemed to indicate contrary results.
Also, using anonymous fds aff
