, "Vivek Agarwal"
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 7:19:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Discussion: Implications on geo-replication due to
bitrot and tiering changes
Perfecto! You nailed it Kotresh ! :)
Except for 3.7,
"Hence for 3.7, logic for feeding database will be
luster Devel"
, "Vijay Bellur" , "Dan
Lambright" , "Nagaprasad Sathyanarayana"
, "Vivek Agarwal"
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 3:44:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Discussion: Implications on geo-replication due to
bitrot and tiering changes
> Sathyanarayana" ,
> "Vivek Agarwal"
> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 3:44:18 PM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Discussion: Implications on geo-replication due
> to bitrot and tiering changes
>
> Hi All,
>
> As per the discussions within Data Ti
ot;Vijay Bellur" , "Dan Lambright"
, "Ben England" , "Ric Wheeler"
, "Nagaprasad Sathyanarayana" ,
"Vivek Agarwal"
Sent: Saturday, December 6, 2014 1:53:16 PM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Discussion: Implications on geo-replication due to
bi
--
>> From: "Venky Shankar"
>> To: "Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar"
>> Cc: "Gluster Devel" , dlamb...@redhat.com,
>> josfe...@redhat.com, "Vijay Bellur"
>> Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 8:53:43 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Gluster-
-- Original Message -----
> From: "Venky Shankar"
> To: "Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar"
> Cc: "Gluster Devel" , dlamb...@redhat.com,
> josfe...@redhat.com, "Vijay Bellur"
> Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 8:53:43 PM
> Subject: Re: [Gl
uot;Venky Shankar"
> To: "Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar"
> Cc: "Gluster Devel" , dlamb...@redhat.com,
> josfe...@redhat.com, "Vijay Bellur"
> Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 8:53:43 PM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Discussion: Implications on geo-
-
From: "Joseph Fernandes"
To: "Venky Shankar"
Cc: "Gluster Devel"
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:42:56 PM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Discussion: Implications on geo-replication due to
bitrot and tiering changes
On the performance on the data path I hav
t;
To: "Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar"
Cc: "Gluster Devel" , dlamb...@redhat.com,
josfe...@redhat.com, "Vijay Bellur"
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 8:53:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Discussion: Implications on geo-replication due to
bitrot and tiering changes!!!
[Adding Dan/Josef/Vijay]
As of now, "rollover-time" is global to changelog translator, hence
tuning that would effect all consumers subscribing to updates. It's 15
seconds by default and has proved to provide a good balance between
replication performance (geo-rep) and IOPS rate. Tuning to a lower
Hi,
As of now, geo-replication is the only consumer of the changelog.
Going forward bitrot and tiering also will join as consumers.
The current format of the changelog can be found in below links.
http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Arch/Change_Logging_Translator_Design
https
11 matches
Mail list logo