> From: "FNU Raghavendra Manjunath"
>>> > To: "Raghavendra Gowdappa"
>>> > Cc: "Raghavendra G" , "Nithya Balachandran"
>>> , anoo...@redhat.com,
>>> > "Gluster Devel" , "Raghavendra Bhat&q
y and hence no nodeid corresponding to
>> .snaps is passed to kernel and kernel is forced to do an explicit lookup".
>>
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Raghavendra
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 12:53 AM, Raghavendra Gowdappa &l
"Raghavendra Gowdappa"
> > Cc: "Raghavendra G" , "Nithya Balachandran" <
> nbala...@redhat.com>, anoo...@redhat.com,
> > "Gluster Devel" , "Raghavendra Bhat" <
> raghaven...@redhat.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, September 7, 2017
cit lookup".
>
> Regards,
> Raghavendra
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 12:53 AM, Raghavendra Gowdappa
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > > From: "Raghavendra G"
> > > To: "Nithya Balacha
t;Gluster Devel" ,
> > raghaven...@redhat.com
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 8:52:28 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Need inputs on patch #17985
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Nithya Balachandran <
> nbala...@redhat.com>
> > wrote:
&
Balachandran" , anoo...@redhat.com,
> "Gluster Devel" ,
> > raghaven...@redhat.com
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 10:23:49 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Need inputs on patch #17985
> >
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
>
- Original Message -
> From: "Raghavendra Gowdappa"
> To: "Raghavendra G"
> Cc: "Nithya Balachandran" , anoo...@redhat.com, "Gluster
> Devel" ,
> raghaven...@redhat.com
> Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 10:23:49 AM
- Original Message -
> From: "Raghavendra G"
> To: "Nithya Balachandran"
> Cc: "Raghavendra Gowdappa" , anoo...@redhat.com,
> "Gluster Devel" ,
> raghaven...@redhat.com
> Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 8:52:28 AM
> Subject
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Nithya Balachandran
wrote:
> It has been a while but iirc snapview client (loaded abt dht/tier etc) had
> some issues when we ran tiering tests. Rafi might have more info on this -
> basically it was expecting to find the inode_ctx populated but it was not.
>
Tha
It has been a while but iirc snapview client (loaded abt dht/tier etc) had
some issues when we ran tiering tests. Rafi might have more info on this -
basically it was expecting to find the inode_ctx populated but it was not.
On 24 August 2017 at 10:13, Raghavendra G wrote:
> Note that we need to
Note that we need to consider xlators on brick stack too. I've added
maintainers/peers of xlators on brick stack. Please explicitly ack/nack
whether this patch affects your component.
For reference, following are the xlators loaded in brick stack
storage/posix
features/trash
features/changetimere
Thanks Pranith and Ashish for your inputs.
- Original Message -
> From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri"
> To: "Ashish Pandey"
> Cc: "Raghavendra Gowdappa" , "Xavier Hernandez"
> , "Gluster Devel"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 11:55:19 AM
> Subject: Re: Need inputs on patch #17985
>
>
Raghavendra,
As Ashish mentioned, there aren't any known problems if upper xlators
don't send lookups in EC at the moment.
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Ashish Pandey wrote:
> Raghvendra,
>
> I have provided my comment on this patch.
> I think EC will not have any issue with this approach
Raghvendra,
I have provided my comment on this patch.
I think EC will not have any issue with this approach.
However, I would welcome comments from Xavi and Pranith too for any side
effects which I may not be able to foresee.
Ashish
- Original Message -
From: "Raghavendra Gowdappa
Hi Ashish,
Following are the blockers for making a decision on whether patch [1] can be
merged or not:
* Evaluation of dentry operations (like rename etc) in dht
* Whether EC works fine if a non-lookup fop (like open(dir), stat, chmod etc)
hits EC without a single lookup performed on file/inode
15 matches
Mail list logo
