On 12/21/2015 12:57 AM, Vijaikumar Mallikarjuna wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Nagaprasad Sathyanarayana
mailto:nsath...@redhat.com>> wrote:
Not clear as to why quota 2 must support both DHT v1 and v2. If
customers continue to use dht v1, can we not allow them to use quota
Venky Shankar wrote:
Shyam wrote:
On 12/19/2015 01:13 AM, Venky Shankar wrote:
Shyam wrote:
On 12/18/2015 04:00 AM, Vijaikumar Mallikarjuna wrote:
Hi All,
Here is the summary of discussion we had today on Quota-v2
Project, user and group quotas will use the same logic of accounting
Shyam wrote:
On 12/19/2015 01:13 AM, Venky Shankar wrote:
Shyam wrote:
On 12/18/2015 04:00 AM, Vijaikumar Mallikarjuna wrote:
Hi All,
Here is the summary of discussion we had today on Quota-v2
Project, user and group quotas will use the same logic of accounting
the
usage
Quota-v2 shou
On 12/19/2015 01:13 AM, Venky Shankar wrote:
Shyam wrote:
On 12/18/2015 04:00 AM, Vijaikumar Mallikarjuna wrote:
Hi All,
Here is the summary of discussion we had today on Quota-v2
Project, user and group quotas will use the same logic of accounting the
usage
Quota-v2 should be compatible
On 12/20/2015 10:57 PM, Vijaikumar Mallikarjuna wrote:
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 8:28 PM, Shyam mailto:srang...@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 12/18/2015 04:00 AM, Vijaikumar Mallikarjuna wrote:
Hi All,
Here is the summary of discussion we had today on Quota-v2
Proje
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Nagaprasad Sathyanarayana <
nsath...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Not clear as to why quota 2 must support both DHT v1 and v2. If customers
> continue to use dht v1, can we not allow them to use quota 1? We need not
> actively maintain quota v1 but only do reactive fixes.
Not clear as to why quota 2 must support both DHT v1 and v2. If customers
continue to use dht v1, can we not allow them to use quota 1? We need not
actively maintain quota v1 but only do reactive fixes.
Thanks
Naga
> On Dec 18, 2015, at 2:30 PM, Vijaikumar Mallikarjuna
> wrote:
>
> Hi Al
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 8:28 PM, Shyam wrote:
>
>
> On 12/18/2015 04:00 AM, Vijaikumar Mallikarjuna wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Here is the summary of discussion we had today on Quota-v2
>>
>> Project, user and group quotas will use the same logic of accounting the
>> usage
>>
>> Quota-v2 should b
Shyam wrote:
On 12/18/2015 04:00 AM, Vijaikumar Mallikarjuna wrote:
Hi All,
Here is the summary of discussion we had today on Quota-v2
Project, user and group quotas will use the same logic of accounting the
usage
Quota-v2 should be compatible with both DHT-v1 and DHT-v2
Project quotas w
On 12/18/2015 04:00 AM, Vijaikumar Mallikarjuna wrote:
Hi All,
Here is the summary of discussion we had today on Quota-v2
Project, user and group quotas will use the same logic of accounting the
usage
Quota-v2 should be compatible with both DHT-v1 and DHT-v2
Project quotas will use gfid of
Hi All,
Here is the summary of discussion we had today on Quota-v2
Project, user and group quotas will use the same logic of accounting the
usage
Quota-v2 should be compatible with both DHT-v1 and DHT-v2
Project quotas will use gfid of the given path as the project-id.
each inode will have
11 matches
Mail list logo