On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:48:06AM +0530, M S Vishwanath Bhat wrote:
> On 15 March 2016 at 20:34, Niels de Vos wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 09:04:48AM -0400, Jeff Darcy wrote:
> > > > Yes, Right now we get the machine from duffy instantly. If it is not
> > instant,
> > > > it means no mac
On 15 March 2016 at 20:34, Niels de Vos wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 09:04:48AM -0400, Jeff Darcy wrote:
> > > Yes, Right now we get the machine from duffy instantly. If it is not
> instant,
> > > it means no machines are in ready state and we will have to wait few
> more
> > > minutes (~5 mi
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 09:04:48AM -0400, Jeff Darcy wrote:
> > Yes, Right now we get the machine from duffy instantly. If it is not
> > instant,
> > it means no machines are in ready state and we will have to wait few more
> > minutes (~5 minutes) to get them.
>
> If machines are available to be
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote:
>> Yes, Right now we get the machine from duffy instantly. If it is not instant,
>> it means no machines are in ready state and we will have to wait few more
>> minutes (~5 minutes) to get them.
>
> If machines are available to be allocated instan
> Yes, Right now we get the machine from duffy instantly. If it is not instant,
> it means no machines are in ready state and we will have to wait few more
> minutes (~5 minutes) to get them.
If machines are available to be allocated instantly, does that mean they're
being re-used across allocatio
On 15 March 2016 at 17:19, Niels de Vos wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 07:21:40AM -0400, Jeff Darcy wrote:
> > > If it is in CentOS CI, then why do we need vagrant? I'm not sure how
> vagrant
> > > would make things more simple.
> > >
> > > We can use duffy to provision the machines, we can use
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 07:21:40AM -0400, Jeff Darcy wrote:
> > If it is in CentOS CI, then why do we need vagrant? I'm not sure how vagrant
> > would make things more simple.
> >
> > We can use duffy to provision the machines, we can use gdeploy to install
> > glusterfs and use distaf to run the t
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 03:40:36PM +0530, M S Vishwanath Bhat wrote:
> On 15 March 2016 at 11:54, Niels de Vos wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 05:43:05PM +0530, M S Vishwanath Bhat wrote:
> > > On 14 March 2016 at 14:29, Raghavendra Talur wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Mar 14,
> If it is in CentOS CI, then why do we need vagrant? I'm not sure how vagrant
> would make things more simple.
>
> We can use duffy to provision the machines, we can use gdeploy to install
> glusterfs and use distaf to run the tests. In the nightly job I created, it
> is using the same (minus the
On 15 March 2016 at 11:54, Niels de Vos wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 05:43:05PM +0530, M S Vishwanath Bhat wrote:
> > On 14 March 2016 at 14:29, Raghavendra Talur wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Kaushal M
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hey Vijay,
> > >>
> > >> Awesome w
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 05:43:05PM +0530, M S Vishwanath Bhat wrote:
> On 14 March 2016 at 14:29, Raghavendra Talur wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Kaushal M wrote:
> >
> >> Hey Vijay,
> >>
> >> Awesome work on the tests!
> >>
> > +1
> >
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Could you please l
11 matches
Mail list logo
