On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 12:06:03PM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 05:40:48PM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Kaleb has pointed out that the number of failures here are creeping up.
> > I've suggested we run this as a smoke test. It's going to fail all the time
> >
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 05:40:48PM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Kaleb has pointed out that the number of failures here are creeping up.
> I've suggested we run this as a smoke test. It's going to fail all the time
> at first, so I propose it be a non-voting test for now. Once we get
Hello,
Kaleb has pointed out that the number of failures here are creeping up.
I've suggested we run this as a smoke test. It's going to fail all the time
at first, so I propose it be a non-voting test for now. Once we get master
in a good shape, we can turn on voting for this job.
Does that
